#perl makefile.pl
Running on Win 32
Build with support for Apache mod_perl?(y/n) [y]n
Will build without mod_perl support
Found Apache::Session Version 1.53
Warning: prerequisite File::Spec 0.82 not found at
D:/Perl/lib/ExtUtils/MakeMake
r.pm line 340, line 1.
Writing Makefile for HTML::Embperl
Hi,
I am trying to mix Mason and Embperl and have a problem with inserting
data into %fdat by the script.
I am not sure, if my problem (see below) is triggered by Mason or
Embperl.
My setup: Apache 1.2.13, mod_perl 1.24 not DSO, Embperl 1.3.1, Mason
1.0.
index.html is parsed by mason; mason p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 6:40 AM +0200 4/18/01, Gerald Richter wrote:
> >
>> At 9:50 AM +1000 4/18/01, Angus Lees wrote:
> > >"?[+ { %fdat, day => 1, month => 10, year => 2000 } +]"
>>
>> Neither of those techniques will handle duplicate entries, but they
>> definitel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 11:37 AM -0400 4/18/01, Kee Hinckley wrote:
>1. By duplicate entries, I mean will that expand a="foo\tbar" (which
>is the result of ?a=foo&a=bar) appropriately?
>2. I can't get that to work at all. It results in "?2000" when I do it.
After some t
>Hi,
>I am trying to mix Mason and Embperl
Just curious, why do mix these two instead of using only one of them ?
>In formular.epl I read a file and insert these data into %fdat for
>further form processing.
>
>So I do (pseudo code):
>
>foreach $key (keys %filehash) {
>$fdat{$key}=$filehash{$k
> well, sorry, but I didn`t tell you it was 2.0b2 ;-)
>
I saw it from the compiler output. I don't have tested 2.0b2 against
ActiveState Perl. It's own my todo list for 2.0b3...
> 1.2.1 installed OK
>
1.3.1 ;-)
>
> looks good, now I try to add an epl script:
> http://localhost/handlers/embpcgi
>
> After some thought I realized that Perl is interpreting the {}'s as a
> block. This solves problem #2.
>
> [+ my $foo = { %fdat, day => 1, month => 10, year => 2000 } +]
>
[+ scalar ( { %fdat, day => 1, month => 10, year => 2000 }) +]
works also
> However as I suspected, arguments that cam
