Marcus Doemling wrote:
> I think one key improvement would be to turn mod_perl into
> mod_embperl ...
> so mod_perl by itself in not "useful"...
The idea is nice, though I'd rather see it as a deeper integration into
mod_perl.
mod_perl IS useful.
As an Embperl "end user" I use mod_perl for it's s
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Marcus Doemling wrote:
>
> I think one key improvement would be to turn mod_perl into
> mod_embperl. What people really want when they are considering
> mod_perl is not better performing CGI scripts it is something like
> Embperl. I don't think these days there are a lot of pe
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:21:21PM +, Ed Grimm wrote:
> I would have no problem with an additional package that bundled the two,
> and was maintained by both orgs. I think that would be great. However,
> I feel that merging the groups and the products, and not releasing
> stand-alone versions
