Re: [Emc-developers] New Trajectory Planner

2014-04-15 Thread sam sokolik
wow. Nice catch. sam? Yes? Does it happen if the program isn't rotated? Well I don't know.. Sorry - basic troubleshooting 101.. I figured my test was running it also in master which doesn't show this problem. Again - awesome work! sam On 04/15/2014 12:21 AM, Robert Ellenberg wrote: Well, I

Re: [Emc-developers] New Trajectory Planner

2014-04-15 Thread sam sokolik
and yay! (no constraint violations) http://imagebin.org/305747 sam On 04/15/2014 05:30 AM, sam sokolik wrote: wow. Nice catch. sam? Yes? Does it happen if the program isn't rotated? Well I don't know.. Sorry - basic troubleshooting 101.. I figured my test was running it also in

Re: [Emc-developers] New Trajectory Planner

2014-04-15 Thread sam sokolik
Well - going through my normal test programs - I ran the tort with the terco config (x and y 132ipm 20in/s^2, z 60ipm 15in/s^2) Z peaks at 78ipm (it goes above 60ipm quite often) rotated and not rotated http://imagebin.org/305767 that was around line 78 sick of me yet? :) sam On

Re: [Emc-developers] New Trajectory Planner

2014-04-15 Thread Robert Ellenberg
Oh well, I suppose I shouldn't be too surprised, I only had time to go through a few programs last night. Is this test program in the usual place? If so, I'll be able to run it again tonight or tomorrow morning and see what's up. At least we're making incremental progress! Rob

Re: [Emc-developers] New Trajectory Planner

2014-04-15 Thread sam sokolik
this is what I am using http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/testing/tort.ngc it is the normal tort with the feedrates set very high. Yes - getting closer and closer! Don't feel rushed - school comes first :) (we have gotten by this long :) ) sam On 04/15/2014 08:16 AM, Robert Ellenberg

Re: [Emc-developers] New Trajectory Planner

2014-04-15 Thread Chris Radek
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 01:21:07AM -0400, Robert Ellenberg wrote: Well, I did a little more investigating, and it turns out the problem is deeper (and older) than I thought. The reason the velocity constraints were being violated here was that the axis_len calculation in emccanon.cc (ARC_FEED

[Emc-developers] BeagleBone Configurations

2014-04-15 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
I am getting close to having the next major version of the BeagleBone uSD card image ready. I have some pending configurations to add (for my CRAMPS board and the Xylotex BBB_DB25), and am working on removing the absolute paths. If there are any new boards, standard machine configurations, or

Re: [Emc-developers] [Machinekit] Re: BeagleBone Configurations

2014-04-15 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
The new images are based on the official BeagleBone Debian builds and include many more utilities than my previous minimal builds. You get leafpad for a gui editor, and chromium for a web browser. On 4/15/2014 11:22 AM, supp...@xylotex.com wrote: Hi Charles, Were you going to be adding

Re: [Emc-developers] New Trajectory Planner

2014-04-15 Thread Robert Ellenberg
That's a possibility, I just did a quick diff of 2.5 and master and don't see any changes to the ARC_FEED function (other than a few renames). On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris Radek ch...@timeguy.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 01:21:07AM -0400, Robert Ellenberg wrote: Well, I did

Re: [Emc-developers] New Trajectory Planner

2014-04-15 Thread sam sokolik
running master as of a week or so ago - doesn't seem to show the same issue (it does have the known acc constraint issue) http://imagebin.org/305773 sam On 4/15/2014 12:02 PM, Robert Ellenberg wrote: That's a possibility, I just did a quick diff of 2.5 and master and don't see any changes