On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:18:33PM +0300, tero.kaarl...@eka-sorvaus.fi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for reminding me about docs. I did update quickref and
> also gcode.txt. It also describes that P word is an optional Dwell
> at the bottom of thread.
Great!
> I tried to find Pause disable from G3
Hi,
Thank you for reminding me about docs. I did update quickref and also
gcode.txt. It also describes that P word is an optional Dwell at the bottom of
thread. I tried to find Pause disable from G33.1 and G76 but I was unable.
Unless those are built in with function SPEED_FEED_SYNCH_START
On 09/25/2016 09:53 AM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> It looks like the buildbot is stuck on this build:
>
> http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/.checkin/builds/4528
>
> It's been running a test for 35 hours, and other builds queued up behind it
> haven't started.
Thanks for the email.
On Monday 26 September 2016 08:22:23 Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Hi Kirk,
>
> The best way to compare would be Z acceleration. It's easy to add to
> the HAL file (needs an extra differentiator). Then, we can look
> directly at the magnitudes of acceleration. Lower amplitude = less
> jitter.
>
> On a
Hi Kirk,
The best way to compare would be Z acceleration. It's easy to add to the
HAL file (needs an extra differentiator). Then, we can look directly at the
magnitudes of acceleration. Lower amplitude = less jitter.
On a slight tangent what do you think of adding a warning / error if the TP
can'
On 26 September 2016 at 01:31, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> I'm glad that it's running well now. It would be cool to find a machine
> that's borderline and see if the patch makes it run smoother.
>
This one (from the LinuxCNC Showcase) actually sounds a little borderline:
https://www.youtube.com/wa
