On 09/06/2018 11:13 AM, Les Newell wrote:
An option would be to have both ppmc.0.dout.03-invert and
ppmc.0.dout.03.invert with a note in the docs that
ppmc.0.dout.03-invert is deprecated and will be removed in
the future.
Code wise it's ugly but you won't end up breaking anyone's
configs.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:50 AM Jon Elson wrote:
> So, for the PPMC DIO (the specific analog interface) and for
> the Universal Stepper and PWM controller extra digital
> outputs, the invert output parameter is like :
> ppmc.0.dout.03.invert
>
> But, due to the typo, the main digital outputs on
I believe mesa uses alias to the same effect.
Fix the pin name, Add an alias pin name for the wrong name and add a warning in
the docs?
Chris M
Original message
From: Jon Elson
Date: 2018-09-06 8:50 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: EMC developers
Subject: [Emc-developers] TYPO in export
An option would be to have both ppmc.0.dout.03-invert and
ppmc.0.dout.03.invert with a note in the docs that ppmc.0.dout.03-invert
is deprecated and will be removed in the future.
Code wise it's ugly but you won't end up breaking anyone's configs.
Les
On 06/09/2018 16:48, Jon Elson wrote:
OUCH, I just found a typo in the hal_ppmc.c driver, most
likely it has been there since John Kasunich wrote it in
2005. Now, I have to decide how to fix it.
So, for the PPMC DIO (the specific analog interface) and for
the Universal Stepper and PWM controller extra digital
outputs, the
