That sounds awesome Phill
Rod Webster
*1300 896 832*
+61 435 765 611
VMN®
www.vmn.com.au
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 10:24, Phill Carter wrote:
>
>
> > On 2 May 2020, at 9:38 am, andy pugh wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 00:32, Phill Carter
> wrote:
> >
> >> If we link to one site then we
> On 2 May 2020, at 9:38 am, andy pugh wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 00:32, Phill Carter wrote:
>
>> If we link to one site then we may as well link to every known site that has
>> a LinuxCNC compatible GUI
>
> That is what I am proposing, yes.
>
> (It's not like there are hundreds)
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 00:32, Phill Carter wrote:
> If we link to one site then we may as well link to every known site that has
> a LinuxCNC compatible GUI
That is what I am proposing, yes.
(It's not like there are hundreds)
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment
> On 2 May 2020, at 9:28 am, John Thornton wrote:
>
> Actually I would just link to the QtPyVCP web site qtpyvcp.com
>
> JT
>
If we link to one site then we may as well link to every known site that has a
LinuxCNC compatible GUI
Cheers, Phill
> On 5/1/2020 4:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Actually I would just link to the QtPyVCP web site qtpyvcp.com
JT
On 5/1/2020 4:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 01 May 2020 16:38:01 John Thornton wrote:
Sounds like a good idea to me.
JT
I think so too John, but verifying that all those extras are alive and
well is more than I'll ask
On Fri, 1 May 2020 at 22:28, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I think so too John, but verifying that all those extras are alive and
> well is more than I'll ask our limited manpower to do, so just the
> mention of something google should find s/b more than enough.
It's a matter of a link and checking it
I think so too.
> On 2 May 2020, at 4:29 am, Chris Morley wrote:
>
> I think we should just worry about/concentrate on, linuxcnc rather then other
> projects.
>
>
> From: andy pugh
> Sent: May 1, 2020 12:17 PM
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers]
On Friday 01 May 2020 16:38:01 John Thornton wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea to me.
>
> JT
I think so too John, but verifying that all those extras are alive and
well is more than I'll ask our limited manpower to do, so just the
mention of something google should find s/b more than enough.
>
Sounds like a good idea to me.
JT
On 5/1/2020 7:17 AM, andy pugh wrote:
I wonder if the docs should mention the GUIs that are made for
LinuxCNC but are not part of LinuxCNC?
I am thinking of
http://www.qtpyvcp.com/showcase/mill_vcps.html
And
https://github.com/DjangoReinhard/JCNCScreen
And
Users could make there own screens for quite some years now - gladevcp, gscreen
and now qtvcp.
User interfaces are integral to Linuxcnc, so removing them doesn't help with
maintenance, other then making less code to search through in one directory
hierarchy. Machinekit separated ui from machine
I think we should just worry about/concentrate on, linuxcnc rather then other
projects.
From: andy pugh
Sent: May 1, 2020 12:17 PM
To: EMC developers
Subject: [Emc-developers] Third-Party GUIs.
I wonder if the docs should mention the GUIs that are made for
> Here are my thoughts on user interfaces.
>
> Frankly I think that just a mention that users can make their own user
> interface would be enough and how to do that using a universal user interface
> method. In my opinion all user interfaces should be removed from LinuxCnc
> proper which will
Here are my thoughts on user interfaces.
Frankly I think that just a mention that users can make their own user
interface would be enough and how to do that using a universal user interface
method. In my opinion all user interfaces should be removed from LinuxCnc
proper which will greatly
I wonder if the docs should mention the GUIs that are made for
LinuxCNC but are not part of LinuxCNC?
I am thinking of
http://www.qtpyvcp.com/showcase/mill_vcps.html
And
https://github.com/DjangoReinhard/JCNCScreen
And maybe also PathPilot.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium
14 matches
Mail list logo
