On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 02:15, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
wrote:
>
> RTAI 5.3 with 4.19.152? That doesn't make sense, the RTAI 5.3.1 release I
> made does a check for a 4.19.195 kernel.
I am getting lost in a maze of numbers, all alike.
Thanks for making me look more carefully. I saw that
RTAI 5.3 with 4.19.152? That doesn't make sense, the RTAI 5.3.1 release I made
does a check for a 4.19.195 kernel.
The 4.19.174 kernel works with the dongle but 4.19.152 does not. 4.19.195 will
have whatever fixes 4.19.174 had and then some.
The 4.19.195 kernel crashes eventually when you do
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 22:49, Sam Sokolik wrote:
> Andy - random thought.. are you using wicd? I had issues getting USB wifi
> to work Ended up installing network manager...
Yes, I have already done this. In fact this is all part of a process
that should end with a 2.8.2 release and a
Andy - random thought.. are you using wicd? I had issues getting USB wifi
to work Ended up installing network manager...
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021, 4:45 PM andy pugh wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 21:12, andy pugh wrote:
>
> > The same device _does_ work with the 4.14.174-rtai kernel (from
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 21:12, andy pugh wrote:
> The same device _does_ work with the 4.14.174-rtai kernel (from last April)
The drivers seem to be installed.
AR drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/built-in.a
AR drivers/net/wireless/quantenna/built-in.a
AR
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 13:34, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
wrote:
> I think that boils down to how important it is that it may crash after
> several hundred or a few thousand runs.
I don't think that is the question. The existing 4.14.174 kernel
package that we have available also crashes.
>
Hi Andy!
>I am happy to build a new kernel + RTAI deb for the LinuxCNC repo if
>you think that 5.3.1 is worth it?
I think that boils down to how important it is that it may crash after several
hundred or a few thousand runs. If the abs.0 stress test is enough to steer you
away from RTAI then
On Sunday 20 June 2021 12:57:01 andy pugh wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 at 02:22, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
>
> wrote:
> > I did the abs.0 stress test and it still dies out after about 300+
> > runs but latency is lower for me without using `isolcpus` at all.
>
> I was planning to try the same
On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 at 02:22, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
wrote:
>
> I did the abs.0 stress test and it still dies out after about 300+ runs but
> latency is lower for me without using `isolcpus` at all.
I was planning to try the same test today, but you have beaten me to
it. (In fact I was
I did the abs.0 stress test and it still dies out after about 300+ runs but
latency is lower for me without using `isolcpus` at all. The 5.4 kernel may fix
the abs issue but I've been busy with work so I don't have time to go through
that. RTAI 5.3.1 is stable with LinuxCNC in my opinion.
On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 11:00, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Any chance of this building as armhf on a 2gig rpi4?
Not easily.
https://www.rtai.org
Says that ARM support is "obsolete, being re-worked"
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use
On Saturday 19 June 2021 00:55:48 Alec Ari via Emc-developers wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It's been awhile since I've worked on RTAI, I pushed a new release
> that comes with a lot of bug fixes and clean-ups. The Xenomai
> developers have fixed a lot of issues in IPIPE and Paolo recently
> added
Hi everyone,
It's been awhile since I've worked on RTAI, I pushed a new release that comes
with a lot of bug fixes and clean-ups. The Xenomai developers have fixed a lot
of issues in IPIPE and Paolo recently added 5.4 kernel support to RTAI SVN. I
know there were some issues with the build bot
13 matches
Mail list logo
