Hi Andy,
On Montag, 8. Juni 2020, 10:10:42 CEST andy pugh wrote:
> Which bug are you talking about here?
I suppose, that for tests you use interpreter in commandline-variant?
or said call "bin/rs274" ?
If not, then please tell me how to use the interpreter from commandline.
But if so, store a
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 02:56, Reinhard
wrote:
>
> What's the sense of runtests?
>
The tests are largely to check that fixed bugs have stayed fixed, many are
based on specific problems previously encountered.
It's a ringle command to run them and a 20 minute wait. It doesn't seem
that much to
On Sonntag, 7. Juni 2020, 17:36:17 CEST andy pugh wrote:
> That seems like a suspiciously large performance increase.
> Do runtests still pass?
What's the sense of runtests?
My debug sessions showed, that stored G5x could never have been tested. Same
is true for tool length compensation.
Or if
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 at 19:33, Reinhard
wrote:
> current version from master:
> real0m20,118s
>
> improved variant:
> real0m0,186s
That seems like a suspiciously large performance increase.
Do runtests still pass?
Do you fancy making a pull-request on
Hi,
I tested rs274 in batch mode and performance is absolutely poor, when using it
as a filter, which is default for unix programs.
I found out, that readline - the slowest known unix program - causes that lag.
When using rs274 as filter, you don't need any of the features of readline, so
I did
