Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-26 Thread Matt Shaver
Thanks you guys! Sam called it correctly: I was missing the 'libboost-serialization-dev' package. I was able to get the configure script to run to the end without installing 'libboost-thread-dev', but Seb's test indicated that I needed that package and a whole bunch more, mostly concerned (I

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-26 Thread Kent Reed
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.comwrote: On 07/25/2013 08:09 PM, sam sokolik wrote: when building on 12.04 - I use sudo apt-get install build-essential autoconf libpth-dev libglib2.0-dev libgtk2.0-dev tcl-dev tk-dev bwidget libreadline-dev python-tk

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-26 Thread sam sokolik
I have done this before - but IIRC - I had issues with apt-get installing what it returns. Is there a trick to it? (copy and pasting the dependencies out of the Debian script to the apt-get install...) sam On 7/26/2013 9:13 AM, Kent Reed wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sebastian

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-26 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 7/26/13 08:28 , sam sokolik wrote: I have done this before - but IIRC - I had issues with apt-get installing what it returns. Is there a trick to it? (copy and pasting the dependencies out of the Debian script to the apt-get install...) sam On 7/26/2013 9:13 AM, Kent Reed wrote: On

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-26 Thread Kent Reed
Addendum: dpkg-checkbuilddeps fails on this distribution with the pithy comment dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: syntax error in debian/control at line 19: block lacks the 'Package' field There's an extraneous blank line in the file debian/control at line 19 which caused dpkg-checkbuilddeps to

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-26 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 7/26/13 08:57 , Kent Reed wrote: dpkg-checkbuilddeps fails on this distribution with the pithy comment dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: syntax error in debian/control at line 19: block lacks the 'Package' field There's an extraneous blank line in the file debian/control at line 19 which

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-25 Thread Matt Shaver
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:46:00 +0200 Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote: As a base for builds right now, the rtos-master-v0 branch is ok and I'll make sure it doesnt break - just note there will be major change coming shortly I'm trying to build this branch, and upon running the

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-25 Thread sam sokolik
when building on 12.04 - I use sudo apt-get install build-essential autoconf libpth-dev libglib2.0-dev libgtk2.0-dev tcl-dev tk-dev bwidget libreadline-dev python-tk python-dev libgl1-mesa-dev libglu1-mesa-dev libxmu-dev libudev-dev libmodbus-dev libboost-python-dev libboost-serialization-dev

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-25 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 07/25/2013 08:09 PM, sam sokolik wrote: when building on 12.04 - I use sudo apt-get install build-essential autoconf libpth-dev libglib2.0-dev libgtk2.0-dev tcl-dev tk-dev bwidget libreadline-dev python-tk python-dev libgl1-mesa-dev libglu1-mesa-dev libxmu-dev libudev-dev libmodbus-dev

[Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-12 Thread Michael Haberler
I understand that folks are waiting for 'the RTOS gang' to produce something tangible, and in Wichita we asked for some leeway for wrapping up the work. (I said two weeks, meaning 'after I'm home' and that still might hold for a rawhide cut) This is where we are: Both John and me work

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-12 Thread Tom Easterday
If one wants to build a system with 12.04/Xenomai/Linuxcnc to use today are the instructions on the wiki still the best option or is there something better/more current to use? -Tom On Jul 12, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote: I understand that folks are waiting

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-12 Thread Michael Haberler
Am 12.07.2013 um 16:33 schrieb Tom Easterday tom-...@bgp.nu: If one wants to build a system with 12.04/Xenomai/Linuxcnc to use today are the instructions on the wiki still the best option or is there something better/more current to use? I looked through the wiki and found lots, including

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-12 Thread Kent Reed
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.atwrote: ... RFP: I suggest we switch all build/install documentation of any kind to in-repository documentation (manual) proper, the Wiki method is just asking for trouble with outdated information I strongly support this

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-12 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/12/2013 10:29 AM, Kent Reed wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.atwrote: ... RFP: I suggest we switch all build/install documentation of any kind to in-repository documentation (manual) proper, the Wiki

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-12 Thread Karl Schmidt
On 07/12/2013 10:47 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Yes, and it should be noted that the number of problems due to documentation and support issues for the BeagleBone exploded after the Black was released due not only to the major changes to the hardware but also to the major structural

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-12 Thread andy pugh
On 13 July 2013 02:25, Karl Schmidt k...@xtronics.com wrote: Also a very important reason to put dates in documentation I think there are Wiki pages we should just plain delete, to be honest. I know it is not the Wiki way but some are just plain wrong. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-12 Thread David Bagby
On 7/12/2013 6:59 AM, Michael Haberler wrote: I routinely build on the BeagleBone and have no surprises to report, meaning this will be available as a build option as soon as we declare victory. Since the last remnants of inline assembly code are gone, the '--with-platform=foo' option

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-12 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/12/2013 9:09 PM, David Bagby wrote: On 7/12/2013 6:59 AM, Michael Haberler wrote: I routinely build on the BeagleBone and have no surprises to report, meaning this will be available as a build option as soon as we declare victory. Since the