Chris Radek wrote:
> we also use @ and ^ as "letters" for the polar coordinates words
> (@radius ^angle). So not only are we out of letters, we're nearly
> out of ascii.
>
Not hardly! We have | (vertical bar), \ ~ ` $ % (hmm, maybe that still
has special meaning
from back in the EIA/ASCII day
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:18:48PM +0100, Andy Pugh wrote:
>
> It is a limit of 9, and really is inherent to G-code, which has A, B,
> C, U, V, W, X, Y, Z as command words to move an axis. There are not
> many (if any) letters of the alphabet unused, and the fact that G-code
> ignores spaces means
Thanks,
Then it's not a problem, I just wanted to make sure it was not joints.
/ regards, Lars Segerlund.
2010/10/12 Andy Pugh :
> On 12 October 2010 13:36, Lars Segerlund wrote:
>
>> I saw in some old mails some limit of 8 axes in EMC, what exactly
>> does this refer to ?
>
> It is a limit
On 12 October 2010 13:36, Lars Segerlund wrote:
> I saw in some old mails some limit of 8 axes in EMC, what exactly
> does this refer to ?
It is a limit of 9, and really is inherent to G-code, which has A, B,
C, U, V, W, X, Y, Z as command words to move an axis. There are not
many (if any) lett
I don't know wether to laugh or cry :-/ ... but must admit that I
should googled it beforehand, forgive a newcomer to EMC ...
/ regards, Lars
2010/10/12 Alex Joni :
>
>
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I saw in some old mails some limit of 8 axes in EMC, what exactly
>> does this refer to ?
>
> The limit i
> Hello,
>
> I saw in some old mails some limit of 8 axes in EMC, what exactly
> does this refer to ?
The limit is for 9 axes: XYZABCUVW
You can have more joints, but currently the code that allows that sits in a
branch, which is not quite done yet: joints_axes3.
> Is it coordinate axes such
