-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/22/2012 6:12 PM, Bas Laarhoven wrote:
> On 21-11-2012 19:45, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> What is actually the status on a debian/ubuntu like package
>> stream for this board? I mean the kernel is one story, but then
>> there's whole lot of other p
Hi Bas.
what I'm after is a low-end platform like the BeagleBone running most or all of
LinuxCNC with the best stepper performance achievable while still running one
of the userthreads RT styles, RTAI being not an option and Xenomai heading for
userthreads.
I'd be willing to put some effort in
On 21-11-2012 21:22, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/21/2012 11:49 AM, Bas Laarhoven wrote:
>> On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote:
>>> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said
>>> 'GladeVCP+HAL standalone applications' and
On 21-11-2012 19:45, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Bas,
>
> Am 21.11.2012 um 18:49 schrieb Bas Laarhoven:
>
>> On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote:
>>> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said 'GladeVCP+HAL
>>> standalone applications' and meant to say 'HAL only' - i.e. no Gcode, no
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:14:24 Michael Haberler did opine:
> Bas,
>
> Am 21.11.2012 um 18:49 schrieb Bas Laarhoven:
> > On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote:
> >> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said 'GladeVCP+HAL
> >> standalone applications' and meant to say 'HAL o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/2012 11:49 AM, Bas Laarhoven wrote:
> On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said
>> 'GladeVCP+HAL standalone applications' and meant to say 'HAL
>> only' - i.e. no Gcode, no task, no mot
Bas,
Am 21.11.2012 um 18:49 schrieb Bas Laarhoven:
> On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said 'GladeVCP+HAL standalone
>> applications' and meant to say 'HAL only' - i.e. no Gcode, no task, no
>> motion - more loudly
>>
>> that works
On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote:
> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said 'GladeVCP+HAL standalone
> applications' and meant to say 'HAL only' - i.e. no Gcode, no task, no motion
> - more loudly
>
> that works and I can recommend looking into especially if the application
On 11/21/2012 8:17 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Am 21.11.2012 um 06:42 schrieb Anders Wallin:
>
>> On 11/20/2012 8:47 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
I just verified this combination works, for the standard Raspberry
Raspbian kernel 3.2.27+ with Posix threads (aka 'simulator'), and
with
Am 21.11.2012 um 06:42 schrieb Anders Wallin:
> On 11/20/2012 8:47 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>>> I just verified this combination works, for the standard Raspberry
>>> Raspbian kernel 3.2.27+ with Posix threads (aka 'simulator'), and
>>> with Xenomai 3.2.21 for somewhat better performance
>>
>
It looks like it is time to start throwing together some breakout code
in experimental repositories (github or bitbucket maybe) for L3. What I
am talking about is sketches which are intended to be thrown away later
and used to inform the new version 3 design.
On Nov 20 2012 12:54 PM, Michael H
> I've ordered a Pi (Farnell re-directs to a local distributor), but the
> > delivery-time seems to be 3 weeks right now(?)
>
> Good luck with that! Some six months ago I ordered an original (256MB)
> Series-B RPi from Allied Electronics here in the USA. It went
> out-of-stock there even as I was p
On 11/20/2012 8:47 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> > I just verified this combination works, for the standard Raspberry
> > Raspbian kernel 3.2.27+ with Posix threads (aka 'simulator'), and
> > with Xenomai 3.2.21 for somewhat better performance
>
> Very cool!
>
> What sort of latency numbers are you
I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said 'GladeVCP+HAL standalone
applications' and meant to say 'HAL only' - i.e. no Gcode, no task, no motion -
more loudly
that works and I can recommend looking into especially if the application isnt
very time critical (I get something like 45uS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/2012 8:47 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> I just verified this combination works, for the standard Raspberry
> Raspbian kernel 3.2.27+ with Posix threads (aka 'simulator'), and
> with Xenomai 3.2.21 for somewhat better performance
Very cool!
On 11/20/2012 11:40 AM, Anders Wallin wrote:
> Good news!
> I've ordered a Pi (Farnell re-directs to a local distributor), but the
> delivery-time seems to be 3 weeks right now(?)
Good luck with that! Some six months ago I ordered an original (256MB)
Series-B RPi from Allied Electronics here in t
Good news!
I've ordered a Pi (Farnell re-directs to a local distributor), but the
delivery-time seems to be 3 weeks right now(?)
It seems that the SPI interface will be most useful for high-speed IO. If I
understood correctly the Pi supports only two separate chips on the
SPI-bus, but on IRC PCW m
17 matches
Mail list logo
