Actually, I do not see why a link on the front page saying "if you are
looking for emc.com -- the computer people... go here" But WHO am I
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:55:04 -0500, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> EMCnc or EMCNC
>
> for Enhanced Machine Computer Numerical Control
>
> Ken
>
> On 1/18/2012 11:32
EMCnc or EMCNC
for Enhanced Machine Computer Numerical Control
Ken
On 1/18/2012 11:32 AM, dave wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:27:41 -0600
> EBo wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:20:01 -0500, Kent A. Reed wrote:
>>> On 1/18/2012 6:42 AM, EBo wrote:
Ick... Oh well, it looks like Fred Proc
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:27:41 -0600
EBo wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:20:01 -0500, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> > On 1/18/2012 6:42 AM, EBo wrote:
> >> Ick... Oh well, it looks like Fred Proctor published the first
> >> paper
> >> in 1993, and emc.com incorporated in 1994... At least they were
> >>
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:20:01 -0500, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 6:42 AM, EBo wrote:
>> Ick... Oh well, it looks like Fred Proctor published the first
>> paper
>> in 1993, and emc.com incorporated in 1994... At least they were
>> nice
>> about it so it sounds like. To bad we could not sk
ds,
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Chris Morley
>> To: EMC DEV
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:22 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Rebranding EMC2 to LinuxCNC
>>
>>
>> Alex I'm sure
On 1/18/2012 6:42 AM, EBo wrote:
Ick... Oh well, it looks like Fred Proctor published the first paper
in 1993, and emc.com incorporated in 1994... At least they were nice
about it so it sounds like. To bad we could not skip 2 and move on to 3
;-) Actually them copyrighting/trademarking what i
ss of finding and enforcing
> a
> solution.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Chris Morley
> To: EMC DEV
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Rebranding EMC2 to LinuxCNC
>
>
> Alex I'm s
required to go through the process of finding and enforcing a
solution.
Regards,
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Chris Morley
To: EMC DEV
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Rebranding EMC2 to LinuxCNC
Alex I'm sure he meant discussion befor
Regards,
> Alex
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "EBo"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Rebranding EMC2 to LinuxCNC
>
>
> > I've completely missed any discussion on the matter. Why is re
Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Rebranding EMC2 to LinuxCNC
> I've completely missed any discussion on the matter. Why is rebranding
> "necessary"? Is there a FAQ/history that explains the rebranding? I
> did a quick look and it wa
I've completely missed any discussion on the matter. Why is rebranding
"necessary"? Is there a FAQ/history that explains the rebranding? I
did a quick look and it was not in the obvious places (ie on
LinuxCNC.org's online documentation).
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:47:07 -0500, Steve Stallings wr
I concur that the change will appear somewhat
abrupt to those who do not follow things closely,
and will confuse many.
The re-branding to avoid the use of "EMC" and
"EMC2" may be necessary, but the obliteration
of "Enhanced Machine Controller" is not, in my
opinion, necessary or desirable at this
12 matches
Mail list logo
