What was the verdict then, is this work going to be incorporated
somewhere in the near future or will we have to wait until Robert has
done more to it?
On 2014-03-21 20:55, John Thornton wrote:
> I have a friend that is very interested in the new trajectory planner
> with an X, Z, A machine. Is
On 4/1/14 14:27 , Marius Liebenberg wrote:
> What was the verdict then, is this work going to be incorporated
> somewhere in the near future or will we have to wait until Robert has
> done more to it?
I'm not sure exactly what state it's in currently. After i make the 2.6
branch I hope to speak
This is what I was expecting also... (big changes needs a lot of
testing before release) (and this was started during the 2.6 work...)
sam
On 04/01/2014 03:45 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 4/1/14 14:27 , Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>> What was the verdict then, is this work going to be inc
Hi Seb,
On 4/1/2014 1:45 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> I'm not sure exactly what state it's in currently. After i make the
> 2.6 branch I hope to speak with Sam Sokolik and Robert Ellenberg and
> see where things stand. I'm hoping to merge it into master for the
> following (2.7) release cyc
On 2014-04-01 22:45, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 4/1/14 14:27 , Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>> What was the verdict then, is this work going to be incorporated
>> somewhere in the near future or will we have to wait until Robert has
>> done more to it?
> I'm not sure exactly what state it's in cu
I am pleased to announce the creation of a branch for stabilizing and
releasing LinuxCNC 2.6. This marks the beginning of the 2.6 release
process. Look for a 2.6.0~pre1 pre-release in the near future.
The 2.6 branch does not contain either of the two big, hotly anticipated
merge candidates, join
