On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:46 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> Good point. How about...
>
> G21 G91
> G38.2 z-20 F80
> G0 X#5061 Y#5062 Z#5063
> G10 L20 P1 Z0
>
That would probably crash the probe, but a variant of that would work.
G21 G91
G38.2 z-20 F80
G0 Z[#5063 + .100] (move up a know amount from
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:29 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 28 July 2018 at 02:15, Kurt Jacobson wrote:
>
> >> Good point. How about...
> >>
> >> G21 G91
> >> G38.2 z-20 F80
> >> G0 X#5061 Y#5062 Z#5063
> >> G10 L20 P1 Z0
> >>
> >
> > That would probably crash the probe,
>
> Unless I am missing
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 6:02 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 27 July 2018 at 21:39, Kurt Jacobson wrote:
>
> > There are significant advantages to having the probed pos be in ABS
> > coordinates, mainly because it makes it easy to set a WCS to the probed
> pos:
> >
> > G38.2 Z-.5
> > G10 L2 P0
On Friday 27 July 2018 20:10:36 Kurt Jacobson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > Somewhere in the gcode is a pair of commands that switch it
> > incremental<->absolute. Yes g90 for absolute, and g91 for
> > incremental. Its also I think, switchable in the view
Here's a routine I use that probes the "lower left" corner
of a part.
So, the probe is on the -X -Y corner.
It backs away a little in -X and then quickly probes in the
+X direction,
then backs off and repeats at a much slower speed, and then
sets #1001
to the offset between the probed position
On Friday 27 July 2018 21:15:03 Kurt Jacobson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:46 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> > Good point. How about...
> >
> > G21 G91
> > G38.2 z-20 F80
> > G0 X#5061 Y#5062 Z#5063
> > G10 L20 P1 Z0
>
> That would probably crash the probe, but a variant of that would work.
>
>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Somewhere in the gcode is a pair of commands that switch it
> incremental<->absolute. Yes g90 for absolute, and g91 for incremental.
> Its also I think, switchable in the view pulldown.
>
> Does this not fix the g38.2 results too?
>
Gene,
On 28 July 2018 at 01:32, Kurt Jacobson wrote:
> I have noticed several people using G10 L20 in their probing routines
> (presumably because it is easy), but it is not at all correct.
>
> Here is a snippet taking from a probing routine:
> ...
> G21 G91
> G38.2 z-20 F80
> G10 L20 P1 Z0
> ...
>
>
On 28 July 2018 at 02:15, Kurt Jacobson wrote:
>> Good point. How about...
>>
>> G21 G91
>> G38.2 z-20 F80
>> G0 X#5061 Y#5062 Z#5063
>> G10 L20 P1 Z0
>>
>
> That would probably crash the probe,
Unless I am missing something, it should be a move back to the exact
point where the probe tripped?
I know there in scilab called ethercos and even though used for other purposes
there might be useful information. My myself are on the path with soem/soes but
currently working with hardware since I discovered drawbacks with the first
chip i tried.
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:26:30 +
Miceli
On 27 July 2018 at 21:39, Kurt Jacobson wrote:
> There are significant advantages to having the probed pos be in ABS
> coordinates, mainly because it makes it easy to set a WCS to the probed pos:
>
> G38.2 Z-.5
> G10 L2 P0 Z[#5063]
Is G10 L20 any help here?
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle
On Friday 27 July 2018 16:39:56 Kurt Jacobson wrote:
> I asked this on IRC yesterday, but realize that was a bad format, so
> here goes!
>
> I have been helping Lcvette with a very simple probing GUI and some
> probing routines. The routines probes the top and then corner of the
> part and set
I asked this on IRC yesterday, but realize that was a bad format, so here
goes!
I have been helping Lcvette with a very simple probing GUI and some probing
routines. The routines probes the top and then corner of the part and set
the specified (not necessarily current) WCOs to the value of probed
13 matches
Mail list logo