I have just suggested (on the forum) that "LinuxCNC Features" should
be brought under LinuxCNC version control, and become part of the
project.
http://www.linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/40-subroutines-and-ngcgui/26578-linuxcnc-features-a-kind-of-ngcgui?start=240#62559
I can't decide if it
On 14 September 2015 at 16:03, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of a
> conversational front-end.
Well, _I_ don't like the name "Axis" for a GUI, that
could cause all sorts of confusion :-)
--
atp
If you can't fix
On 14 September 2015 at 16:03, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of a
> conversational front-end. To me that sounds like an enumeration of the
> things LinuxCNC can do.
Yes, and I suspect that this is part of the
On 9/14/15 6:14 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> I have just suggested (on the forum) that "LinuxCNC Features" should
> be brought under LinuxCNC version control, and become part of the
> project.
>
>
On 14 September 2015 at 16:21, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
> The popularity might be the difficulty in installing Nick's Features.
This is partly why I would like to "bring it in from the cold" so to speak.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
The popularity might be the difficulty in installing Nick's Features.
I havent followed the forum, and i have asked.
I will read the forum now.
And for the name..
Linuxcnc Features or Features is about as good as Axis
google linuxcnc axis to see why
didnt hurt the popularity of axis the front
On 14 September 2015 at 17:54, Jeff Epler wrote:
> Being in linuxcnc.git might be the worst possible choice for a new and
> fast-moving project,
The fact that you think it is "New" seems to show something about it
needing more exposure. Nick first mentioned it in May 2013.
If the goal is to have better online collaboration for this
linuxcnc-related project, I think at least some conderation should be
given to using github rather than hosting on git.linuxcnc.org.
I feel like github would give better visibility (as you mention,
wizards.git is an almost-forgotten
On 9/14/15 10:54 AM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> If the goal is to have better online collaboration for this
> linuxcnc-related project, I think at least some conderation should be
> given to using github rather than hosting on git.linuxcnc.org.
Managing this and other LinuxCNC add-ons as separate
yes Nick has several oyutube videos, google "youtube cnc ru features"
> Has anyone made videos to showcase it running?
>
--
___
Emc-developers mailing list
On Sep 14 2015 1:37 PM, Andrew wrote:
> 2015-09-14 21:13 GMT+03:00 Peter C. Wallace :
>
>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>>
>> > However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of
>> a
>> > conversational front-end. To me that sounds like an
better yet google "Nick Drobchenko"
he's the wiz
tomp
--
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
On 14 September 2015 at 22:11, EBo wrote:
> Has anyone made videos to showcase it running?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6ZxQrjfAE0
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
On Monday 14 September 2015 17:11:10 EBo wrote:
> On Sep 14 2015 1:37 PM, Andrew wrote:
> > 2015-09-14 21:13 GMT+03:00 Peter C. Wallace :
> >> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> >> > However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name
> >> > of
> >>
>
it is not really a collection of CAM software is it? What exactly do
all the features do, or intended to do?
On Sep 14 2015 12:13 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>
>> However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of a
>>
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of a
> conversational front-end. To me that sounds like an enumeration of the
> things LinuxCNC can do.
>
LiveCAM?
>
> --
> Sebastian Kuzminsky
>
>
Just a suggestion:
Just fancy, linuxcnc is the distribution and "linuxcnc-feature" is a
package of this distribution.
So they have to take care delivering a working package.
Would this be a approach?
g m
On 2015-09-14 19:43, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 9/14/15 10:54 AM, Jeff
2015-09-14 21:32 GMT+03:00 EBo :
> it is not really a collection of CAM software is it? What exactly do
> all the features do, or intended to do?
As the author describes it in russian forum, it is similar to ngcgui -
it allows to create subroutines and macros for mills and
On 14 September 2015 at 20:11, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> As the author describes it in russian forum, it is similar to ngcgui -
> it allows to create subroutines and macros for mills and lathes.
But more than that, there is already quite a range of existing subroutines.
2015-09-14 21:13 GMT+03:00 Peter C. Wallace :
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>
> > However, I don't like the name "LinuxCNC Features" for the name of a
> > conversational front-end. To me that sounds like an enumeration of the
> > things LinuxCNC can do.
> >
20 matches
Mail list logo