For what it's worth... I would second the notion that the new behavior
be the default. Much higher likelihood that it would "just work."
On 02/27/2017 10:52 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 02/27/2017 09:42 AM, John Kasunich wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, at 03:51 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>>> Actually,
On 02/27/2017 09:42 AM, John Kasunich wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, at 03:51 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>> Actually, I thought option 1 was the "best", but required a
>> bit more code and more testing.
>> Since I've discovered the offending line occurs in ONE and
>> only one place in the whole driver
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, at 03:51 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> Actually, I thought option 1 was the "best", but required a
> bit more code and more testing.
> Since I've discovered the offending line occurs in ONE and
> only one place in the whole driver (I think),
> then conditional compilation of one
