Re: [Emc-developers] RFC: Reduce number of HAL pin types.

2023-10-12 Thread Nicklas SB Karlsson
Agree. Consider type checking in general as something good. Some errors may be discovered before program is run because pieces simply do not fit together. In the best cases a valid output is also produced for all possible inputs and runtime errors never happen. Nicklas Karlsson Den

Re: [Emc-developers] RFC: Reduce number of HAL pin types.

2023-10-12 Thread Chris Morley
I assume one drawback/advantage is after the change if a component really expects an unsigned range the user can easily connect a signed component and it might take a while to find that bug. Sent from my Galaxy Original message From: andy pugh Date: 2023-10-12 1:57 a.m.

Re: [Emc-developers] RFC: Reduce number of HAL pin types.

2023-10-12 Thread andy pugh
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 04:05, Chris Morley wrote: . > I assume you would use a feature branch to start anyways, so we could see > what problems crop up and assess. Yes, this is definitely not something to drop straight into master. (or 2.9) -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a