On 16/08/19 13:04, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
Hi All,
Has anyone tried to use link-time optimization in the realtime object
builds? I think the motion / TP build would be a good candidate for it, so
we could improve inlining of things like posemath.
Best,
Rob
Hi Rob,
In an ideal world, the
>> There was talk of sourceview2 not being available - that is much
more serious.
Yet again, just add it to your Buster repo for now, the sid version
should work
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=python-gtksourceview2
The other problem with gmoccapy is python-gst.
AFAIR there is
What is -vte used for?
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=python-vte
Suggests that is it still there in Sid.
Hi Andy
virtual terminal emulation
Buster is full of holes currently, where packages in sid have not been
back-ported.
You should find that the kernel, gcc libc etc.
On 04/06/19 13:05, emc-developers-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:45:28 -0500
From: John Thornton
To: EMC developers
Subject: [Emc-developers] Merge Just One Commit Up
Message-ID:<21236f20-9c1c-944e-ab39-bed182e41...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
Hi Chris,
I actually approached it from the other direction.
What we required initially was a HAL only stack, it was only later that I
tried to get the CNC stack to build.
The repo's show what is in each stack so I won't detail that.
The process is largely just hard slog through the Makefiles,
cted by mobile internet and AI, the CNC
technology seems to be old since the EMC emerging in 1990s. We need
modern visions like OROCOS and ROS to push this project further.
On 09/09/2018 06:27 PM, schoone...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
As my paws are all over a lot of the work you ar
Hi Chris,
As my paws are all over a lot of the work you are mentioning (multicore
in collaboration with Michael Haberler some years back)
and the splitting into HAL and CNC stacks, why not contact me direct to
discuss.
I think there is scope for collaboration which could be to both our
