Re: [Emc-developers] How closely do we need to adhere to the NIST standard?

2024-04-09 Thread Andy Pugh
> On 9 Apr 2024, at 19:43, Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote: > > There might be requirements for safety reasons but do not think we need to > care about some standard require MDI commands > to be executed only with a physical button. This is actually already the case with Touchy, FWiW. And is one

Re: [Emc-developers] How closely do we need to adhere to the NIST standard?

2024-04-09 Thread Nicklas SB Karlsson
There might be requirements for safety reasons but do not think we need to care about some standard require MDI commands to be executed only with a physical button. For safety reasons I have a safety relay connected to physical buttons. Then power is turned off and energy stored stored in

Re: [Emc-developers] How closely do we need to adhere to the NIST standard?

2024-04-09 Thread Eric Keller
I see no evidence that NIST wanted that document to serve as a standard. They don't generally issue their own standards, but when they do, they let you know. I don't think LCNC should be bound to that document, it was incomplete. I would close the bug report as a misunderstanding of LCNC's goals.

[Emc-developers] How closely do we need to adhere to the NIST standard?

2024-04-09 Thread andy pugh
Apart from anything else, I am not sure that it is a standard. This is based on bug report #2956. Our current behaviour does not match the NIST RS274 interpreter "report" from 2000. The last actual "RS" standard (ie the RS in RS274) was issued in the 1970s. There is an ISO standard from 1982,