Re: Who can apply the CE Ma

1996-04-29 Thread Rob Newell
4/29/96 Date: REWho can apply the CE Mark?3:35 PM Subject: Time: This all sounds

Re: FCC Website Information

1996-04-29 Thread Bill Lyons
In message H000132b0ef81593@MHS ron_well...@hp-paloalto-om4.om.hp.com writes: Item Subject: FCC Website Information __ Reply Separator _ Subject: FCC Website Information Author: Non-HP-owner-emc-pstc

Power cord length

1996-04-29 Thread Mel Jensen
All; Can anyone provide guidance as to allowable length(s) for attached power cords for ITE equipment? Either e-mail or post responses. And thank you in advance for any and all help. Mel Jensen, P.E. Cray Research, Inc. TEL:715-726-8374 1050 Lowater Rd.

CE Mark ?????

1996-04-29 Thread Holly Lungren
Our sales manager, Barry Stangline, might be able to assist you with questions concerning product safety listing or the CE Mark. He can be reached at Inchcape Testing Services at 503-626-6694. We are a certification office in Beaverton, Oregon, right outside of Portland. We also have offices

Re: NPF Returns

1996-04-29 Thread Bill Lyons
In message H000132b0f0aee3d@MHS ron_well...@hp-paloalto-om4.om.hp.com writes: Hello Bill, Hey, that's great, for the UK! Maybe? What about other EU Member States? Also, how do you flag a NPF product to the local custom authorities? Other EU Member States (more precisely, other

Re: Who can apply the CE Mark?

1996-04-29 Thread Gabriel_Roy
The solution appears simple to me, your customer prepares his own Declaration, based on reviewing your data, uses his own model numbers, and puts his own CE mark on his equipment. Gabriel Roy Hughes Network Systems Maryland To: emc-pstc @ ieee.org @ SMTPGW cc: From: JEichner @ statpower.com

Who can apply the CE Mark?

1996-04-29 Thread JEichner
We have an interesting situation that I am not sure how to deal with, and I would welcome any advice I can get from the group, please. I am being asked if we can sell products to customers who want their name only to appear on the product, not ours, and so order products with no labelling on

FW: bad switch wiring diagram

1996-04-29 Thread rbusche
You might find this interesting, especially those of you who may have purchased them. FYI ___ To: Multiple recipients of list SAFETY From: Safety on Fri, Apr 26, 1996 6:15 PM Subject: bad switch wiring diagram For

Re: Dates on MDoC

1996-04-29 Thread Victor L. Boersma
Hi Jon, Perhaps this is a very good time to remind all and sundry that most of the Directives have been modified at one time or another by other Directives. To the best of my knowledge, one is expected to cut out relevant parts of new Directives and glue them into the old Directives. I know

Re: Dates on MDoC

1996-04-29 Thread Jon D Curtis
The requirement for date coding the Declaration of Conformity (DoC) under the Low Voltage Directive is contained in Directive 93/68/EEC. This directive modifies the CE marking scheme contained in many directives and adds CE marking to the Low Voltage Directive 73/23/EEC. For the Low Voltage

Re: Standards Route vs. Essential Requirements Route

1996-04-29 Thread Nick Rouse
There is no either/or choice between the essential requirements and the harmonised standards. You must always meet the essential requirements. If it is found that your equipment fails to meet the essential requirements despite meeting the harmonised standards the equipment will still be in breach

Re: Dates on MDoC

1996-04-29 Thread Nick Rouse
The requirement for the last two digits of the year in which the CE marking was affixed on the DoC is the 6th indent of Article13 (6)B of the CE marking directive 93/68/EEC. Note that year numbers are not called up for the marking itself. Nick Rouse