FCC Rules do address this issue:
FCC Rules Part 15, Section 15.31 (k) discusses composite systems
which incorporate different devices contained in either a single
enclosure or in separate enclosure connected by wire or cable. Among
other things, this paragraph
Here's an intriguing story from Japan, reported via Associated Press:
Medic, one of the first companies to market small-range jammers for private
use, has sold about 6,000 of its Wave Wall devices since their debut one year
ago.
The Wall Wave costs about $480, and generates RF energy on the
Roger
That is true, but if your company sells other components that could be used
in the 'good system' then you must use your own products.
The assumption is that your sales personnel will not sell a competitors
printer (etc) in place of your own, therefore for the system test to be
valid any
gbenja...@xlcomputing.qc.ca writes:
Hello All,
Would someone know a good source of information on the European packaging
rules?
Every piece of information would help and would surely be appreciated.
Thank you
Regards
Guy Benjamin
Compliance Leader
Cycomm Mobile Solutions Inc.
Guy,
I just
I have had the same experience with desktops. All desktop cabinets cannot
support the weight of monitors, especially 15 and larger.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Briggs mbri...@elliottlabs.com
To: emc-pstc emc-p...@ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Wednesday, September
Hi group,
There is a paragraph of 6 Performance criteria on Page 5 of EN
50082. It describes Performance criterion A, B and C.
On the other hand, there is a paragraph of 9 Test results and test
report in 1000-4-2, 1000-4-3, 1000-4-4, 1000-4-5, 1000-4-6 and so on. It
asks us to
Funny how the same experience can lead to different conclusions. Like
you, I have found that desktop systems do radiated more with the monitor
on top than with it beside the unit. At that time we did extensive
tests to find out why because our pc was well designed with lots of
conductive
One note on the Gateway towers -
The newer models implement conductive gaskets instead of fingers, which
seem to hold up to continuous opening of the cover better. Also, gaskets
don't break off.
- Randy Flinders
- EMC Engineer
- EMULEX Corp.
-Original Message-
From: Bailin
Ed,
That's very interesting. Because Japanese people are not lawsuit happy like we
are in the US, I can see this kind of
product being sold. However, in the US I don't think this kind of product
could last because lawyers would jump all
over it. I can see it now - someone's phone call
According to the Basic standards, the criteria in the Generic standard takes
preceident over the criteria in the basic standard, so there really is no
conflict even though they do differ.
--
From: Bailin Ma[SMTP:b...@namg.us.anritsu.com]
Reply To: Bailin Ma
Sent:
I heard from the test lab that you can use a good system as your
peripherals to test your EUT rather than test it with a worst system
to obtain worst case for CE and FCC compliance, is that right? As I
know for CE and FCC, they only require a typical system, so you can
I find this a bit amusing, as we have a desktop PC that we use to test our
modems, and the PC emissions actually go down when we put the monitor on
top of the PC! This is the only way that this PC would pass Class B
emissions. We believe that the monitor puts some weight onto the finger
stock to
12 matches
Mail list logo
