RE: FCC exemptions

Moshe, The FCC provides a brief explanation of this test equipment exemption and other exemptions in OET bulletin 62, page 7 (download from http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/bulletins/) The key is that the equipment is used exclusively as test equipment in environments where interference is

FCC Part 68 Project Web Site

All - I understand that the FCC maintains a web site where you can monitor the status or your Part 68 submittals. Does anybody now the WWW address? Thanks Mike Campi Corporate Compliance Engineer Fujitsu PC Corporation - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To

Re: FCC exemptions

Part 18 is to be used by ISM equipment that intentionally generates RF energy for a designed purpose such as an arc-welder, MRI medical device, or an induction heater. Equipment that intentionally generates RF energy to be used within the device such as for the purpose of moving data along a bus

Re: FCC Part 68 Project Web Site

Mike, You should be able to check Part 68 equipment approvals progress at http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/Part68_Actio n s / Regards Geoff From: Campi, Mike mca...@fpc.fujitsu.com To:'EMC/PSTC' emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: FCC Part 68

Excellent Product Safety Job Opening

Apologies if this is a duplicate but I dont think the original went through yesterday. We are currently looking to fill a Senior Product Safety Engineer position within the fast paced consumer/business IT industry. Senior Product Safety Engineer will be responsible for providing product Safety

FCC Form 731

Is there a web site for the FCC Application for Equipment Authorization, Form 731, where the application can electronically be completed and also a way to file the application electronically? I found the form on the FCC's web site, but it apparently allows a copy but no data to be entered.

CSA C22.2 No. 107.1 clause 4.2.6.7

This clause of the Canadian standard refers to a label that may be applied on the part(s) in question. The clause (5.14) that is referred to says that the text given (in that clause) or equivalent may be used to warn of the parts being live. What other warning labels are acceptable? Are there

Exception for top openings

CSA C22.2 No. 107.1 Clause 4.2.5.3 has an exception for the hole size allowed over live parts, if the equipment is: a.. 1.8 (or more) metres tall b.. A UPS Can anyone tell me why this exception applies only to UPS's, and not to other power supplies? Arjen Dragt Compliance Engineering

Clause 4.3.18 of IEC 950

Hello, I am having a discussion with a colleague about Clause 4.3.18 of IEC 950. This clause is for direct plug-in equipment. The clause states ...at a distance of 8 mm behind the engagement face of the socket-outlet. The discussion is on what is meant by behind. Does it mean towards the end

RE: FCC exemptions

Thanks Lyle and everyone, The answer seems to be not in part 18 but in the detail of the OET document. It seems the intention was to exempt maintenance, research, evaluation, simulation, and other analytical or scientific applications. Whatever that might mean. In some cases the same device