RE: NEBS secondary protectors

2001-05-02 Thread Don House
Jim, If I recall correctly you are aware of certain types of secondary protection that are not good to use. It would probably be good to share that information so that all of us do not have to re-learn it the hard way. Thanks, Don -Original Message- From: JIM WIESE

RE: NEBS secondary protectors

2001-05-02 Thread Dwight Hunnicutt
Jim! are you out there?? Grace us with your wisdom... -Original Message- From: Don House [mailto:dho...@excelsus-tech.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 10:47 AM To: dwight.hunnic...@vina-tech.com Subject: RE: NEBS secondary protectors Check with Jim Wiese at ADTRAN. He knows ALOT

RE: AC Power Primer?

2001-05-02 Thread Kazimier_Gawrzyjal
Hi Rick, I've heard the term split-phase applied to this sort of set-up. My opinion and not that of my employer. Regards, Kaz Gawrzyjal kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com -Original Message- From: rbus...@es.com [mailto:rbus...@es.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 3:31 PM To:

RE: AC Power Primer?

2001-05-02 Thread Jim Eichner
Hi Rick: 1. Re phase-to-phase connection to 2 legs of a 3-phase system, I'd call it single phase. 2. The 120+120=240 system that enters our homes is commonly called split-phase because it is a single phase 240Vac circuit that happens to be split into 2 by the centre-tap to provide 120Vac

AC Power Primer?

2001-05-02 Thread rbusche
I am in the process of assisting our publications group with documenting an ac power configuration. As simple as this sounds, it turns out there are varying opinions in our engineering group regarding the naming convention for input power, in particular single phase verses two phase. We all

Stuck in Germany!

2001-05-02 Thread Peter Merguerian
Dear All, I have submitted an electronic ballast (ballast designed for building-in and provided with pigtail leads used for installation at the base of road lamps) to a reputable German test house for investigation and the following points were discovered: 1. PCB is not European approved!!! I

Re: definition of type certification

2001-05-02 Thread georgea
Susan, Simply put, a type certification is a 100% test by an independent certification agency against the applicable standard, of a single sample unit representative of future production units. The key words are single sample. Typically, forthcoming production units are tested during

definition of type certification

2001-05-02 Thread Beard, Susan (TRANS, GEHH)
Forgive me if this is a naive question (given my background of compliance to MIL-STDs), but I keep hearing references to type certification which seems to be relative to generic FCC, ACA, etc. type compliance testing of comm devices. I am more familiar with references to specific FCC Part 15

Re: Australian power cable requirements.

2001-05-02 Thread Lou Aiken
There is a point where the tolerances on the AWG and the metric sizes overlap and allow a single cord to be approved as both SJT and HO5VV in North America and Europe. Australia will accept the Eurpoean cable. I know it is made by Feller Lou Aiken 27109 Palmetto Drive Orange Beach, AL 36561

RE: Australian power cable requirements.

2001-05-02 Thread Fleury, Bill
I believe wire gauge might be an issue as well. Bill Fleury -Original Message- From: Russell, Ray [mailto:ray_russ...@gastmfg.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 6:46 AM To: 'Cameron O'phee'; 'EMC - PSTC Forum' Subject: RE: Australian power cable requirements. Cameron, I had a

Compliance Design CDI-1000i plugin modules

2001-05-02 Thread Stillingsl
Group, Hopefully someone on this list will know whom the contact is now for Compliance Design Surge Equipment. We are looking for modules for our CDI-1000i system. Thank you in advance. Larry K. Stillings Compliance Worldwide, Inc. 357 Main Street Sandown, NH 03873 (603) 887 3903 Fax

FW: EN 41003:1999

2001-05-02 Thread richard . payne
Hi Zohar: The Scope of EN41003 reads: This standard applies to equipment designed and intended to be connected to a TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK termination. It does not apply to equipment covered by EN60950. Therefore, equipment intended to connect to the network that is not ITE (for example

RE: Australian power cable requirements.

2001-05-02 Thread Russell, Ray
Cameron, I had a similar situation some time ago with an internal cable and it had to do with the insulation thickness. The SJT cord was only rated 300V, and the insulation thickness did not meet the European standard. We changed to a 600V cord, which was accepted. Ray Russell r...@gastmfg.com

EN 41003:1999

2001-05-02 Thread Zohar Zosmanovich
Hello to all, Any one familiar with EN 41003:1999 standard, if yes, where is it applicable? Does EN 60950/IEC 60950 covers EN 41003 requirements? Zohar (Jana) Zosmanovich Compliance Engineer, RADWIN ltd. 34 Habarzel St., Tel Aviv 69710, Israel Tel.: 972-3-7666735 ; Fax: 972-3-7657535

RE: quiet support equipment

2001-05-02 Thread Don Rhodes
George, I would look into a HP ink jet printer. I have always found them to be very quiet. The EMC engineers that work that division of HP are just up the road a bit from us and have a good reputation for thorough and quiet designs. Don Rhodes EMC Engineering InFocus Corporation -Original

Australian power cable requirements.

2001-05-02 Thread Cameron O'phee
Hi All, I have a situation where the test house I normally use for safety will accept SJT cordage for an internal power cable but a different test house will not. The power cable conducts 240v from one power supply to another, with both supplies internal to the machine. The second test house

Re: info on AS4295

2001-05-02 Thread Martin Garwood
The .pdf for this land mobile standard can be obtained (for about US$20), from www.standards.com.au or direct here http://www.standards.com.au/Catalogue/Script/Details.asp?DocN=stds13452 Best Regards, Martin. - Original Message - From: Beard, Susan (TRANS, GEHH)

Re: info on AS4295

2001-05-02 Thread John Woodgate
C71CF3BA37F7D411A66600508BF92B3C67474D@CIN03XBMAILGE, Beard, Susan (TRANS, GEHH) susan.be...@gehh.ge.com wrote: Could anyone provide me with a synopsis of the requirement for radio receiver sensitivity of -113dBm for a SINAD of 12dB? If I was very clever and it wasn't so late, I could tell you