Dear Selva,
Can you tell us a little more about your product? You mention that it is
ITE class B. Does it have a transmitter section? If not, then you should
be aware that class B IT equipment falls under the Declaration of Conformity
rules (See 47 CFR 15.19, I think...) There is no need to
Pierre,
It depends on how fast you want your FCCID. If you can wait for FCC to
review the package and issue you the certificate then by all means submit
directly but you can expect to wait 6 weeks or more. If you want to get your
product to market quickly I would suggest the TCB route. They will
Pierre,
If the lab at which your testing was conducted is designated as a Conformity
Assessment Body(CAB) under the EMC Sector of the US - EU Mutual Recognition
Agreement then you need not submit anything at all to the FCC. You may
simply issue a Declaration of Conformity and ship your product
Hello from France,
I will have to submit a product to FCC in order to obtain a FCCID (product
is an ITE, class B).
After doing the test in an european listed laboratory (filed at FCC) and
obtaining the Grantee Code, do I need to submit the package (result, doc,
description, ...) to a TCB, or can
Try Rubbermaid 5M715 (beige) or 5M716 (gray). Good for 400 lbs.
30 inches(0.76 meter) high.
John Shinn, P.E.
Manager, Lab Operations,
Sanmina-SCI
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Gary McInturff
Sent:
It is definitely not a requirement for EMC, regardless of the standard.
The ground connection has no function in EMC but for the extremely low
frequencies.
I believe that is a generic design principle to ALWAYS connect
protective ground first and disconnect last when connecting any connector
Muriel
I doubt the FDA or EPA would have any authority over radio waves since it is
quite obviously in the FCC's jurisdiction.
I do not remember if these documents address your query directly, but they
address what is considered acceptable radiation and safe distances when
installing
Just a curiosity question which came up in a
discussion with a sightless person elsewhere ...
Q: How well do you think the safety standards
cover product use by sightless end users?
Regards, Doug McKean
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC
I am looking for a non-metallic table I can put equipment on for
pre-pre-compliance checks. Was thinking of Rubbermaid Corp or the likes, but
first blush says they don't have anything sufficiently close.
Anybody our there buy rather than make the chamber test tables?
Group,
Regarding Functional earthing requirements for Class II equipment.
Is there a general requirement for the functional earth in an equipments
power connector to follow the make first break last rule with regards to EMC
(EN55022) and Safety.
Thanks in advance
Jon Jones
ATL telecom.
My recollection is (without reading the standard) that the make first /
break last requirement only applies to connectors operated by the user or
other non trained persons.
Then it should also seem reasonable that the requirement would not apply to
a product meeting ALL class II requirements.
In light of recent discussions about overvoltage protection, the
following document announcement from IEC should be of interest.
IEC/TR
https://domino.iec.ch/webstore/webstore.nsf/all/56F1A2F4B4FAAFADC1256BE
30010EC05?OpenDocument 62066 (2002-06) Ed. 1.0
Surge overvoltages and surge
Keith,
There is a revision of the UN treaties on the carriage of dangerous
goods by road, rail and air due in January. I don't know much about
it (yet), but see if the following helps provide some grip:
Council Directive 94/55/EC of 21 November 1994 on the approximation
of the laws of the
13 matches
Mail list logo
