Re: IEC vs. EN

I read in !emc-pstc that Sam Wismer swis...@acstestlab.com wrote (in 000501c2b98b$166cb190$0b01000a@sam) about 'IEC vs. EN' on Sat, 11 Jan 2003: Thanks for the clarification. Is there any documentation to that affect, or is it common practice to apply the EN transition period to the IEC basic

RMCEMC January Meeting Announcement

To all interested parties: The January Meeting will be:Power Supply Decoupling - How 'bout them vias? Presenter: T.J. (Bill) Ritenour Date : January 23 2003 Location : Front Range Community College, Westminster Colorado. Room Timberline (S117) Times : 5:30 -6:30 Social Hour at the

RE: IEC vs. EN

John, Thanks for the clarification. Is there any documentation to that affect, or is it common practice to apply the EN transition period to the IEC basic standard that may be called for in the applied generic or ps standard? Also, why do some Generic or PS standards call for the IEC version

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

I read in !emc-pstc that Juhasz, John (IndSys, GE Interlogix) john.juh...@ge.com wrote (in 4606624A2A8ABE41AFBA5F8306F2ECB203611C@F TWMLVEM01.e2k.ad.ge.com) about 'Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?' on Fri, 10 Jan 2003: Is there anyone subscribed to this forum who is on the EN 55022

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

I read in !emc-pstc that drcuthbert drcuthb...@micron.com wrote (in cfefa50c9bcad21197470001fa7eba6b14121...@ntexchange05.micron.com) about 'Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?' on Fri, 10 Jan 2003: Chris, some excellent points! My take on this is that a fiber optical cable has a

Re: Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?

I read in !emc-pstc that Chris Maxwell chris.maxw...@nettest.com wrote (in 83d652574e7af740873674f9fc12dbaaf7e...@utexh1w2.gnnettest.com) about 'Fiber optic cable testing per EN 55022:1998 ?' on Fri, 10 Jan 2003: So where is the crossover point? Does it have to do with skin depth? Maybe the

Re: IEC vs. EN

I read in !emc-pstc that Sam Wismer swis...@acstestlab.com wrote (in 001001c2b8c4$7df00d20$0b01000a@sam) about 'IEC vs. EN' on Fri, 10 Jan 2003: Case in point:  EN 61000-4-4 Amd. 2 DoW for the superseded standard is 7/04 however EN55024 calls out IEC 61000-4-4. No, it only appears to.

Re: European 3 Phase

I read in !emc-pstc that ggars...@us.tuv.com wrote (in OFE36B9C6E.F1FBF 989-on86256caa.0078d...@us.tuv.com) about 'European 3 Phase' on Fri, 10 Jan 2003: It may or may not be that the BSI document is better, I do not have a copy. The DoC (Dept of Commerce, in this case) document is free. In