Re: D of C for medical P.S.

Would my customer (manufacturer of the end-use medical device) have any trouble in Europe when the D of C for the unit's power supply is lists the LVD? After the power supply arrives at your customer's facility, no European authority will ever ask to see the power supply DOC. Once the power

CCC marked displays

Does anyone know of a source of CCC marked displays, either CRTs or FPDs? Thanks in advance, Brian Epstein Sr Regulatory Compliance Engineer Veeco Instruments 112 Robin Hill Rd Santa Barbara CA 93117 805-967-2700 x2315 brian.epst...@veeco.com

Re: D of C for medical P.S.

I read in !emc-pstc that boconn...@t-yuden.com wrote (in F7E9180F6F7F58 40858d3db815e4f7ad1f2...@cms21.t-yuden.com) about 'D of C for medical P.S.' on Wed, 26 Feb 2003: Thanks for the ideas. But as the LVD specifically precludes medical stuff, how can I declare conformity? Has any NCB

RE: D of C for medical P.S.

Gentlemen Thanks for the ideas. But as the LVD specifically precludes medical stuff, how can I declare conformity? Has any NCB issued a formal recomendation for this particular combination? Would my customer (manufacturer of the end-use medical device) have any trouble in Europe when the D of C

Bluetooth and WLAN products in France

Hello everyone, Do you know if the French Government has dropped the rf power output restrictions for Bluetooth? If not, do you know if they intend too? Thanks in advance for your help. Regards, Kurt __ Kurt Fischer BQB Hyper Corporation 1279 Quarry Lane, Ste. B

Re: D of C for medical P.S.

I read in !emc-pstc that Jon Griver jgri...@601help.com wrote (in 3E5C9943.14190.33FECD@localhost) about 'D of C for medical P.S.' on Wed, 26 Feb 2003: You are right not issuing a D of C to the MDD, as your product is not a medical device or an accessory ot a medical device. On the other hand

Re: D of C for medical P.S.

From the end-user's point of view, the power supply must meet the requirements of EN 60601-1. That is the standard that will be applied when the OEM product is evaluated. Any declaration of conformity or CE marking that goes on the component will serve only one purpose, and that is to move

Re: AC feed fail changeover relay

I read in !emc-pstc that bruce maule bruce.ma...@alliedtelesyn.co.nz wrote (in se5cab2b@leo.alliedtelesyn.co.nz) about 'AC feed fail changeover relay' on Wed, 26 Feb 2003: I believe that this scenario is reasonably common, from talking over with our electrical safety test lab, but the

Contactors to BSG132

Hello to all, Could someone please explain the essential requirements for a contactor designed to meet BSG132? Such a contactor is required by DEF STAN 59-41 DCE03 Exported Transients Power Lines. Many thanks Vic Gibling e2v technologies Ltd This message is from the IEEE EMC Society

PSTN... end of line Production tests

Hi All, Previously, end of line testing on PSTN critical parameters were a must to meet the Approvals bodies requirement i.e. before you could attach the BABT Approvals (UK) label. Q1. Since deregulation i.e. introduction of the RTTED I would assume that this is no longer required? Q2. I would

AW: D of C for medical P.S.

Brian,Jon, we have done several investigations of medical PC in accordance to IEC60601. The requirements of IEC60601-1 is different from IEC60950 mainly in regards of spacing, dielectric testing, leakage and the insulation of the interfaces. This has to be documented well in the IEC60601

CCC mark China

Hello, I am very grateful for all those who replied on the CCC mark question. Many thanks. Kind regards, Jan Vercammen Agfa-Gevaert NV, Belgium This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at:

Re: D of C for medical P.S.

Brian, You are right not issuing a D of C to the MDD, as your product is not a medical device or an accessory ot a medical device. On the other hand I see no reason not to issue a D of C to the LVD. Compliance with a standard in the list of Harmonised Standards is not the only way to