Hello Guys,
Apologies for getting into many IF's. Yes, our discussion is based on
assumption and description provided. There are many unknown for us on his
unit.
I believe the fundamental of the safety concept, which have been discussed
should be look in depth by Raymond.
Maybe it is time for
Hi John,
The following article was published in the last issue of Int'l Product
Safety News. Enjoy!
Regards, Art Michael
Int'l Product Safety News
A.E. Michael, Editor
P.O. Box 1561 INT
Middletown CT 06457-8061 U.S.A.
Phone : (860) 344-1651
Fax: (860) 346-9066
Email :
John,
The following link has the LVD Update #4. This update followed a June 2003
Working Party Meeting.
http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/electr_equipment/lv/direct/review.htm
Best Regards
Joe Martin
Applied Biosystems
marti...@appliedbiosystems.com
Group,
Not directly an EMC or Safety position but in this position you will work with
all of engineering including Compliance.
Please forward all emails to me directly. No phone calls please.
Regards,
Jeffrey Collins
Sr. HW Engineering Manager
Corporate Compliance Homologation
CIENA
Greetings All,
For those of you interested in a Product Safety position, please see below. I
am just posting this as a courtesy and on behalf for the company. Please
contact the company for details, not me.
Thanks.
Richard
=
Richard Georgerian
Compliance Engineer
Carrier Access
Hello Everyone,
I have read on this list and have been told by TUV that the lower limits for
the voltages of products which fall under the Low Voltage Directive may be
eliminated so that low voltage products would now fall under that directive.
On the Europa website I read an LVD Working
John Dave,
Thank you for your replies. I was hoping someone else had independently found
these issues with the document. My only other choices were, I am somehow
going senile or worse, insane.
I am concerned becuase this lack of attention to detail on the part of the
committee, brings the
Doug,
IEC 60035-2-82 is the current prevalent safety standard for gaming machines.
Testing and meeting the EN version will suffice for Europe, but meeting the
IEC with all group differences, and country deviations is quickest and easies
way to go. On that note—Please remember that not all
Hello Chengwee:
Whether customer can accept his adaptor with only 1500Vac hipot tested
where
other power supplies can withstand 3000Vac?
This is an interesting question as it implies
that the higher the withstand voltage the better
the unit. The statement may even imply that a
Hello group;
Recently a client has requested a product safety evaluation for CE Marking of
their casino game – a fairly typical electronic slot machine. The machine
does not issue tokens to a winner, but rather prints a redeemable coupon.
Similar products by the client have been evaluated
Hi Peter:
I have and continue to advocate (in IEC TC 108)
that such classes should apply to CIRCUITS, not
to products.
If this is endemic in IEC (as your statement implies), it
may require a elephantine effort. Good luck.
Yes. And thank you.
The IEC Class I and
This is an old issue for some (from a 20MAR1998 FDA
advisory), but an interesting spectrum allocation issue for
your edification
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dtvalert.html
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical
Let's look at these what ifs.
From: ChengWee Lai
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:38 PM
Raymond might be able to convince Safety agency
to accept PE continuity test
with 1500Vac Hipot at the production line.
However in the Scenerio with end
customer, it could mean business or no
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Doug, Dave
This is not the first time the formulae and examples in 6.7 have been called
into question.
One of my customers raised a query about a year ago, and I forwarded the query
to the Chairman of the IEC TC for 61010, as well as the (BSI)
14 matches
Mail list logo
