Peter,
I agree with your conclusions and I am not suggesting that individuals should
not take any action. I am saying that Trade Associations, since they
represent a large community base and are well used to lobbying, are more
likely to achieve a positive result. Of course, this requires that
Try here
http://europa.eu.int/cgi-bin/eur-lex/udl.pl?REQUEST=Service-Search
http://europa.eu.int/cgi-bin/eur-lex/udl.pl?REQUEST=Service-SearchLANGUAGE
=enGUILANGUAGE=enSERVICE=eurlexCOLLECTION=ojDOCID=2003c271PAGENO=32
LANGUAGE=enGUILANGUAGE=enSERVICE=eurlexCOLLECTION=ojDOCID=2003c271PAGE
NO=32
Richard -
It has to start somewhere. Saying nothing returns the same.
Peter
From: richhug...@aol.com
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 9:42 AM
Peter,
The emc-pstc list is a good place to exchange ideas between
engineers but not a good forum for actioning change.
This message is from the
Hello Luke,
I will guide you:
On the whats new page click on electromagnetic compatibility (if this is
one of interest)
Go a little down on the new page to Publications in the Official Journal:
Here you will find a number of boxes, if you want the PDF file in English
you must click on the box
Anyone know where there are pdfs?
Luke Turnbull
Helge Knudsen h.knud...@niros.com 11/21/03 05:35pm
Dear Group,
I have just recognized new listings in OJ:
RTTE: C271 of 2003-11-12
EMC: C271 of 2003-11-12
Medical Devices: C273 of 2003-11-14
And others
Visit:
Peter,
The emc-pstc list is a good place to exchange ideas between engineers but not
a good forum for actioning change.
However, many of the subscribers of this forum (whether contributors or not)
are also members of trade associations. Any effective trade association
should have links to their
Greetings.
Please be advised that registration for our Dec 4th presentation
(Partial Inductance Simplified for details see http://www.ieee.org/rmcemc )
will close on Dec 1st. We encourage you to register as soon as
possible to guarantee your place.
Best Regards
Charles Grasso
Senior
I suspect that CSA or TUV would demand similar...
It may be possible to generate a generic component spec on the
Safety-Critical component list. Specify max V, I, P for the device, and
specify the commutation device. This will probably require that you
periodically dissect a HDD.
The fact that
Folks -
Following Richard Hughes advice, I returned to the CEN web
site and went to the 'contact us' page to drop a note. The
contact page is broken.
Revisiting the site map, I found an e-mail address,
c...@cenorm.be, to which I sent the following. The
webmaster's e-mail address is as
Thank you for the responses.
It was suggested I try the UL web site. UL does provide the
scope of its standards on-line, with a nifty, value-added,
pink background. Most of the standards I'm interested in
are not IEC/CENELEC based, so this option is not viable, in
this instance. Even so, the
I have an on going debate with UL concerning HDD in hazardous locations.
Their main concern is the motors used in the HDD and the fact that they must
be brushless, I am not debating that fact, but I have been trying to prove to
them that the motors used in the new HDDs are brushless and there
The follows text are from RTTE annex VII
3. The CE marking must be affixed to the product or to its data plate.
Additionally it must be affixed to the
packaging, if any, and to the accompanying documents.
In my esperience is better have CE mark on the carton also to not oblige the
autority to
From: Garnier, David S (MED) [mailto:david.garn...@med.ge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:06 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: EMI receiver: Dynamic Sciences DSI-2020
Hello,
Has anyone had any experiance with this receiver
that they would be willing to share with me (on
13 matches
Mail list logo
