That's my feeling - it's an illogical exclusion. At most the standard
should disallow the use of any (ie technology neutral) device that has
not been tested to a relevant standard that takes cycle life into
account, but to pick on auto-reset electromechanical devices while
allowing auto-reset
While not mandatory the ENEC Mark can be useful on components as some Agencies
will accept this Mark as showing compliance to the applicable component
standards. I have found this useful when getting a CB report for a product
which incorporates an ENEC Marked safety critical component.
In message
3c6137471f17424280d9b2ceaefd7f853b6...@usmafrexmb01.bose.com, dated
Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Tyra, John john_t...@bose.com writes:
While not mandatory the ENEC Mark can be useful on components as some
Agencies will accept this Mark as showing compliance to the applicable
component
We are looking to hire a full-time compliance engineer for our Livermore
operation, which focuses on 3-phase solar and wind power products from
30kW into the low megawatts. The position deals mostly with product
safety and utility interconnection compliance, with any EMC or other
product
4 matches
Mail list logo
