Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Doug Powell
Grace, It is possible to overload the input of your analyzer/receiver without damage, normally this just causes signals to clip. However strong signals outside your normal range of measurement can be a concern. If you are concerned about spikes caused by click sources, it is possible to

[PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Grace Lin
Dear Members, Happy New Year!!! I need your advice to prevent RS ESU receiver from damage. A service report (as a result of annual calibration) indicates frequency response out of specification below 10MHz. Adjusted frequency response. Adjusted the reference oscillator to optimize frequency

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
Happy new year to all, and hope you had a great Christmas ! Every receiver or spectrum analyzer used for conducted measurements on a LISN or AMN to mains voltage ABSOLUTELY NEEDS a dedicated surge/spike suppressor. They are easy to purchase, but you can build one yourself using a fast

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Doug Powell
Here is one example: RS®ESH3-Z2 Pulse Limiter High RF input levels and high-energy interfering pulses generated on artificial mains networks when the DUT is switched on and off can damage the RF input circuits of test receivers. The RS®ESH3-Z2 pulse limiter limits and reduces the interference

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Doug Powell
Ken, Having worked power electronics for years, I have on occasion seen conducted emissions far exceed 107 dBuV. Of course I have routinely measured emissions on mains of up to 100 amps and more recently up to 700 amps. Caution is warranted. Also some of these products use AC large

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Ken Wyatt
HP/Agilent sells a spike limiter especially for CE measurements. Before we installed that, I was always taught to disconnect the spectrum analyzer prior to switching the LISN from one phase to the other. Apparently, this can cause major spikes which will zap the front-end preamp of the spec an.

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Cortland Richmond
Yes, an excellent post. There is a problem sometimes when using a LISN for 400 Hz power. I remember a manager at a former employer who didn't want to add a high pass filter between his LISN and receiver when the limit was too low for an attenuator. He ended up buying a new a receiver

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Ken Wyatt
I believe the limiter mentioned below also included a 60 Hz (high pass) filter to reduce the fundamental. ___ Kenneth Wyatt Wyatt Technical Services LLC Woodland Park, CO Email Me! | Web Site | Blog Subscribe to Newsletter Connect with me on LinkedIn On Dec 27, 2011, at 11:33

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Ken Javor
Gert provided an excellent post, but I am puzzled by the need for all this protection. Granted I work in a screen room with either dedicated power or filtered power, but here is the question, nonetheless. The conducted emission limit above 150 kHz is at or above 60 dBuV these days, correct? So

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
Because EUT may contain inductors and switches that generate spike when intentional or unintentional switching or switching ON/OFF during the test. Invariably the day comes that a BIG transient blows BIG money without such a protector. Gert Van: emc-p...@ieee.org

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Ken Javor
Clearly, under the conditions of hundreds of Amperes (what LISN was employed?) and large contactors, special attention is required. But the original post seemed to address more mundane, everyday situations, and that was the focus of my question. Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 From:

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Ken Javor
Once again, 400 cycles is a special case that does not apply to the original post. But in my experience, if testing a 400 cycle load, one is either testing to MIL-STD-461, or RTCA/DO-160, or an international equivalent. In ­461, the test method requires a 20 dB pad between LISN EMI port and EMI

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Doug Powell
The CISPR 16, 5 uH LISN. Doug Powell Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:40:13 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Reply-To: Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com Subject: Re: [PSES]

Re: [PSES] IEC 61010-1 (2010) Altitude Correction for Clearances

2011-12-27 Thread Richard Nute
In my many visits to high altitude, I have never noticed an abrupt change in pressure from 80 kPa to 70 kPa at 2001 meters altitude. Hi Doug: Indeed, nature seldom has abrupt changes. However, standards committees tend to use tables rather than graphs. Tables depict step-functions,

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread John Woodgate
In message CAJq2vaiFyrB6kE3BkVn33=tTm1XhfWUXNw3Oe8cmmjknrobK=g...@mail.gmail.com, dated Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Grace Lin graceli...@gmail.com writes: Hi, Grace. I need your advice to prevent RS ESU receiver from damage.  A service report (as a result of annual calibration) indicates frequency

[PSES] Homologation Engineer Opportunity: Juniper Networks

2011-12-27 Thread Marko Radojicic
Hello All, We have a great opportunity in our Homologation Engineering group at Juniper Networks. http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/careers/job-search/?920163 The position is located in Sunnyvale, CA. It's an exciting time to be working for Juniper. If interested, it would be best to

[PSES] What means do you use to exercise Ethernet telecom ports?

2011-12-27 Thread Knighten, Jim L
I am curious what means people are using to exercise Ethernet telecom ports when testing for conducted emissions according to CISPR 22 and conducted immunity according to CISPR 24? Do you use an external piece of equipment (AE) to send Ethernet traffic? If so, what do you use and do you like

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Derek Walton
I'm not sure if someone has covered this, but my biggest concern with damaging a receiver/SA is during the application of, or removal of power. Specifically, if power is applied at the peak of a line cycle, a pulse almost equal to the peak line voltage couples through the internal LISN cap

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Ken Javor
Back in the early 1990s, Tegam supplied a LISN that had a switch which could be depressed while connecting the EMI receiver to the LISN EMI port. Without that switch, the open-circuit potential at the EMI port is the line potential. When the switch is depressed, it shorts out the bleed resistor

Re: [PSES] What means do you use to exercise Ethernet telecom ports?

2011-12-27 Thread Doug Smith
Hi Jim, Just be careful with the exercising equipment you use. I have seen a lot of Ethernet equipment that did not have very good balance and potentially cause a failure of either emissions or immunity unless you isolate it from the test electrically. For an

Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver

2011-12-27 Thread Ken Javor
Not entirely correct. The 1 kOhm bleeder working against the 0.25 uF blocking cap yields a 10:1 voltage divider, open-circuit. Still too much for an EMI receiver absent adequate attenuation and/or filtering. At 400 cycles (per one post, not the original concern) the problem is greatly

Re: [PSES] What means do you use to exercise Ethernet telecom ports?

2011-12-27 Thread Lg
At minimum, usually the case in development, continuous pings. Later, xmit a file, read the file compare, in a fashion that is quick, as in single digit seconds. Emissions, look for 125 MHz and harmonics. Immunity, look for missed or slow pings, or mis-copied files. Sent from my MetroPCS