All,
The scheduled June 27th NPSS
meeting is canceled.
If you or anyone
you know would like to give a product safety technical presentation, please
contact Steve Brody by email at steven.br...@brooks.com
or Tony Nikolassy by email at a.nikola...@yahoo.com). A technical presentation
I'm seeking a clearer definition of what the term, Probability of Exposure
means in regards to IEC 61010-1 3rd Ed. In table 12. There are two choices;
Exposure is not intended during Normal Use
And
Exposure is intended during Normal Use.
What I have is a pinch hazard which exceeds the
Brian
Compared with Severity issues, the Probability issue is always a difficult
subject to address in risk assessment because it can be, and often is, far
more subjective, especially where it involves human behaviour - human error
being one of the greatest causes of accidents, and
In message
64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB0261F219@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local,
dated Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com writes:
Would this be considered intended or not intended exposure?
If properly drafted, a standard must confine its provisions to those
A DMRN (Differential-Mode Reject Network) works well for 2-wires, but has
anyone tried for 4 wires? I suppose a common-mode transformer with a
bandwidth up to 30MHz would do.
Any suggestions from the RF gurus in the group?
Brian,
I see the answer a little differently from John. (And I may well have
misunderstood John, but the balance of this message assumes I haven't).
Probability of Exposure does not ask for an analysis of whether the
hazard *could* be got to, but rather *will* it be got to. And I think
this
Hello,
We have a full-time position in our EMC Design Engineering team. Please
see details below, and contact to me directly if you are interested.
Thanks,
Oscar Fallah
Sr. Manage, EMC Design Engineering
Juniper Networks
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Senior/Lead EMC Design Engineer (Member of
7 matches
Mail list logo