What does the correct value mean? Unless the field intensity is constant
over the aperture of both loops, there won¹t be correlation between
different size loops. That was the whole point of the comment about what
size sensor to use. It cannot be cavalierly dismissed by citing an antenna
factor.
[Fourth attempt to get MY mail server to post to the group, so a lot of
information has been removed.]
Need table that shows recommended limits up to 1MHz.
No interest in electric fields.
Anybody have such a table? or URL that shows such a table?
Regards,
Robert
-
In message 20120707091554.589bc...@resin04.mta.everyone.net, dated
Sat, 7 Jul 2012, Macy m...@basicisp.net writes:
Need table that shows recommended limits up to 1MHz.
EMC or human exposure limits? In any case, the EMC limits are not the
same for all products.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only.
Being as he said no interest in E-Fields, I imagine it's about human exposure
limits. And as always, it depends on where which jurisdiction is making
requirements.
Doug
Douglas E Powell
Compliance Engineering and Consulting
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01
-Original Message-
From:
Try FCC OET 65:
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet65/oet65.pdf
However, (excerpted)
Radio frequency (RF) spectrum
Although the RF spectrum is formally defined in terms of frequency as
extending from 0 to 3000 GHz, for purposes of the FCC's exposure
Cortland,
Thank you for the URL AND the excerpt.
Not good news, wanted to have 100uT, not 2uT
I sure remember years ago seeing something like 2mT, especially at AC mains
frequency was allowed. Utilities companies pushed for that because the parks
and playgrounds under the power lines were a
Macy:
IEEE C95.6 Covers ELF electric and magnetic field exposure guidelines related
to human exposure. C95.1 covers radio frequencies.
Attached is a summary of the C95.6 and C95.1 (RF) MPE values. Both standards
are available from the IEEE at no charge (the distribution is subsidized by the
7 matches
Mail list logo
