In message
d250d01e39356a4e9cc3b4b459d6655097dcf...@ms-cda-01.advanced-input.com,
dated Thu, 18 Jul 2013, McInturff, Gary gary.mcintu...@esterline.com
writes:
Anybody know the Docopocoss (or whatever on that) on IEC 60950-1:2001,
First Edition I have a small sale - not large enough to
Hello Scott,
Here are my rambling thoughts
For the EU, I think you need to comply with the EMC Directive because I recon
your product satisfies the following Directive definition...
/‘apparatus’ means any finished appliance or combination thereof made
commercially available as a single
The USA standard on this used to be MIL-B-5087, but I'm sure that must have
been superseded by now. Still, it essentially said no star washer, use
split-ring washers only. The rationale was stars only made tiny
point-contacts, which could be vaporized and cause arcing under high-fault
conditions.
Can't comment on ITE equipment since we make Audio Video products but I have
found this process to be very chaotic and time consuming for our products
There was a considerable amount of documentation required especially for the
manufacturing facilities.
There are only a handful of accredited
Thanks John
Besides
IEC 60044-8. the general transformer standard
IEC 61558-1, -2.4 and -2.6
I was also advised to consider
EN61869-1:2009 - Instrument Transformers, General Requirements
EN61869-2:2012 - Instrument Transformers, Additional Requirements for
Current Transformers.
Chris Wells
In message A55CB212C030418F8FD1EC87CC2A5E4B@christopher, dated Fri, 19
Jul 2013, Chris Wells radioactive55...@comcast.net writes:
I was also advised to consider
EN61869-1:2009 - Instrument Transformers, General Requirements
EN61869-2:2012 - Instrument Transformers, Additional Requirements
In message
d250d01e39356a4e9cc3b4b459d6655097dd0...@ms-cda-01.advanced-input.com,
dated Fri, 19 Jul 2013, McInturff, Gary gary.mcintu...@esterline.com
writes:
Thanks for the input so far and the date of standard withdrawal, but
still need to understand if I can maintain presumption of
Gary
You have a presumption of conformity when you apply a Harmonised Standard up
until it is superseded by a new version (or new amendment to existing version)
- the DOCOPOCOSS date.
For LVD there is no requirement to use Harmonised Standards. However,
evidence/experience/heresay would
Gary -
Per the list of harmonized standards published by the European Commission,
EN 60950-1:2001 was superseded by EN60950-1:2006 on 1JAN2010. Per
CENELC's web site, EN60950-1:2006 was published in 14APR2006.
If we were to assume even a three months delay before being published in
the EU OJ,
There are also amendments. As of 01 Mar 2013, this means EN60950-1:2006 plus
amendments A11:2006 , A1:2010, and A12:2011.
Jim Hulbert
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Peter Tarver
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 11:35 AM
To:
Hi Gary:
Personally, I support the sales force with whatever they
need.
If I understand correctly, you have low-voltage device.
Chances are that none of the standards changes affect
your device. Updating your certification should take
less time than arguing against the work, and would make
Thanks Jim. I'm aware of those as well. If justification could be made to jump
to the appropriate edition we would also upgrade for the latest amendment, and
quite possible proposed changes under the right circumstances.
Thanks all
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Jim Hulbert
I suppose that someone should do a session at the symposium on Errors,
Omissions, Obligations, and Professional Ethics for Compliance Engineers.
Support of sales is important; and should be in a regulatory professional's
pro forma list. I have prefaced all requestedd compliance requirements with
Peter
The other alternative is Ministry of Industry and Trade application of
exemption based on test reports but it may not be available - depends on HS code
To get SII you need a person on the ground and who speaks the same language
Let me know how I can help
Sent from my iPhone
Peter S.
14 matches
Mail list logo
