Thank you Experts,
I knew I would get very valuable information from this group.
Using the projects link provided by Bernd, I was able to determine that the EMC
and Safety subparts of EN 63044 have DOW's of 2020 and 2021 respectively.
Both general standards EN 50491-1 and EN 50491-5-1 have alread
Didn¹t see any responses to this query, so just one possible qualification.
The EMCO Model 3105 was only spec¹d to 12.4 GHz. Don¹t know how high in
frequency you need to go. A casual inspection of the 3105 vs. the immediate
follow-on 3115 revealed no observable differences, although some subtle
ma
Hi Bernd, John,
Thanks for the useful information, much appreciated.
All the best
James
-Original Message-
From: Dürrer Bernd
Sent: 15 March 2018 10:00
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] AW: [PSES] FW: HBES/BACS Standards in the OJ
Hello James,
EN 50491 is a series of CE
Hello James,
EN 50491 is a series of CENELEC standards while EN 63044 is an adoption of IEC
standards, so probably this is part of harmonisation of European and IEC
standards. The Turkish customer is correct that part 1 EN 50491-1 has been
superseded by EN 63044-1 that is not listed in the OJ,
The new series, 63044, are based on the corresponding IEC standards, as
you can see by the leading '6'. The older series, 50491, are home-grown
(in Europe) CENELEC standards, as you can see by the leading '5'.
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayle
Hi John,
Do you have an idea why a new series of standards are being introduced
rather than updating the older ones?
Thanks
James
From: John Woodgate
Sent: 14 March 2018 23:19
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: HBES/BACS Standards in the OJ
These delays in upd
6 matches
Mail list logo
