Re: [PSES] classification of the output

Mick, Thanx for the reply given on this thread. I am familiar with the 60479 clauses you describe. My overall comment is that 60479 folks primary focus is on preventing VF (not killing people). Much of what you quoted relates to such electric shock situations. Becaus

[PSES] shielded magnetic loops don't work anything like what people think

Hi All, A few years ago, I started to generate some data for a tutorial on shielded magnetic field loops for new engineers. As happens most of the time with my research on most topics, I found out most of what I and everyone thought about shielded magnetic field loops was wrong. The electric fi

[PSES] Factory inspections

Hi EMC and Safety community,Any advice/information for how to approach EMC and safety for industrial test equipment would be greatly welcomed because I'm new to product safety with experience only in EMC for ITE(4 yrs) and NEBS(1 yr) compliance. Currently reading 'Electrical Product Compliance a

Re: [PSES] classification of the output

Joe Randolph and I talked about “pulsed power” delivery at the 2019 ATIS-PEG conference last week and how it should be treated. A good starting point is the IEC 60479 series of documents on “Effects of current on human beings and livestock”. IEC 62368-1 mentions the time locked IEC TS 60479-1:

Re: [PSES] classification of the output

Ted has proposed something that safety standards committees do not do: EXPERIMENTS to prove or disprove the requirements. But I have done voltage, current, and thermal experiments on students (voluntarily) at the Energy Class 1 levels in my HBSE courses. One of the more interestin