Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] EMI testing with ambient

Using the assumption below that both signals are BB and not synchronized, could you get away with something as simple as converting the noise amplitude and noise plus EUT amplitude to linear terms and subtract the noise? I believe there is precedence in CISPR regs for this approach. Brent

Re: [PSES] Exemptions from UK Plugs and Sockets Regulations

An interesting question, and, from the text of Schedule 1, I would guess that these are technically excluded (though, for why, I have no idea). In addition, that same exclusion would appear to include all the power line comms devices which use the mains supply network and also any BS1362

Re: [PSES] Exemptions from UK Plugs and Sockets Regulations

Well, that's what it says, clearly. It obviously hasn't been updated to allow for things like wireless-controlled switching. Parliament has been too busy with Brexit (or perhaps the 'Marketing of Animal-derived Shoelaces Order (Wales) 1947'?) The GPSD applies, I suppose, so any deviation from

Re: [PSES] Exemptions from UK Plugs and Sockets Regulations

Hi Charlie, Not my speciality, but doesn't the requirement in EN 62368-1 require compliance with BS 1363? 4.7 Equipment for direct insertion into mains socket-outlets . 4.7.2 Requirements The mains plug part shall comply with the relevant standard for the mains plug. I'm not sure if

[PSES] Exemptions from UK Plugs and Sockets Regulations

Schedule 1 of The Plugs and Sockets etc. (Safety) Regulations 1994 states 1. Any plug, socket or adaptor which incorporates any other electrical device (other than a F fuse link, switch or indicator light). Does that

[PSES] Fully anechoic chamber vs. Semi-anechoic chamber

I will start benchmarking Fully Anechoic Test Chamber vs. Semi-anechoic Test Chamber Price and technical issues are important. Anyone who have been through this lesson before? Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Mvh Amund Westin ** E-mail: