Hi Scott
The text is correct but not well written or explained
The paragraph before the text you quoted states
The tests consist of subjecting the receiver to a continuous interference
signal introduced from a signal
generator. This signal shall cover at least the entire assigned band (not
Dear Colleagues,
We are about to start the process of switching our safety lab accreditation
basis from ISO/IEC 17025:2005 to ISO/IEC 17025:2017. We thought we would take
that opportunity to completely refresh our quality manual, procedures and SDs.
Rather than start completely from scratch,
There is a 2001 EN version is also available for purchase
https://www.evs.ee/products/evs-en-61293-2001
From: Lesmeister, Glenn [mailto:glenn.lesmeis...@hpe.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 3:02 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Source for Nameplate Rating Nomenclature
Dear Colleagues
In our Concord (suburb north of Toronto, Canada) location we have an opening
for a product safety specialist for our small A2LA accredited product safety
laboratory.
We are looking not only for someone who is familiar with testing to EN/IEC
60950 and IEC 62368 but equally
My test method for this test has always been that each port that exits the EUT
gets an individual test.
If in this case the “system” has multiple power cords exiting the cabinet, then
the number of ports to be tested equals the number of cords. If they are
combined within the system and only
Hi Doug
The testing templates were for tests found in either IEC 60950 or IEC 62368.
Kevin
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2018 1:27 PM
To: Kevin J Harris
Cc: EMC-PSTC
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety Test Templates Question
Interesting question/
Can you
Hello
On test templates from several laboratories I have noticed where they indicate
whether or not a particular test was successful or not, that there is an
arrangement of text such as this
Conforms:Y □N □
Non-Conforms: Y □N □
Is there a technical or legal
Hello
I am looking recommendations for companies (preferably in North America) that
can provide training in product safety testing and evaluation to engineers who
are beginning their career.
Ideally the training would concentrate on IEC 62368-1
Kind regards
Kevin
-
Hello Amund
Sorry for the late reply on this
Not to rain on your parade any further but the upper operating temperature for
Class II is 55 C not 40 C. The note for Clause 7.2 in EN 50131-1 is not
correct. Not sure why that has never been fixed but it might be because notes
cannot contain
9 matches
Mail list logo