s and code cannot possibly be more than 1500
pages
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:06 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 16 AWG wire usage
I'm trying a preemptive attack o
RG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 16 AWG wire usage
In message
, dated Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Brian Oconnell
writes:
>Article 430 should be referenced for this stuff. In general, overload
>protection required for each branch circuit at the distribution panel.
Less bother doing it that way, than arguing with
lto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 9:30 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 16 AWG wire usage
In message
, dated Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Brian Oconnell
writes:
>Article 430 should be referenced for this stuff. In general, overload
>protection required for
In message
.com>, dated Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Brian Oconnell
writes:
Article 430 should be referenced for this stuff. In general, overload
protection required for each branch circuit at the distribution panel.
Less bother doing it that way, than arguing with the AHJ.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only.
thermomagnetic,
probably cannot meet all O/L and S/C and FLA requirements.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 9:32 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] 16 AWG wire usage
Hi folks,
NFPA 79:2012 12.6.1.1
Hi folks,
NFPA 79:2012 12.6.1.1 defines requirements for permitting the use of 16 AWG
wire for motor power circuits if among other things the "Circuit is provided
with Class 10 overload protection". Does anyone know if the Class 10
protection rating applies/can be implemented with a motor's i
6 matches
Mail list logo
