'
Subject: Re: [PSES] 60950 1st edition and amendments
Hi Gary:
Personally, I support the sales force with whatever they
need.
If I understand correctly, you have low-voltage device.
Chances are that none of the standards changes affect
your device. Updating your certification should take
less time
In message
d250d01e39356a4e9cc3b4b459d6655097dcf...@ms-cda-01.advanced-input.com,
dated Thu, 18 Jul 2013, McInturff, Gary gary.mcintu...@esterline.com
writes:
Anybody know the Docopocoss (or whatever on that) on IEC 60950-1:2001,
First Edition I have a small sale - not large enough to
In message
d250d01e39356a4e9cc3b4b459d6655097dd0...@ms-cda-01.advanced-input.com,
dated Fri, 19 Jul 2013, McInturff, Gary gary.mcintu...@esterline.com
writes:
Thanks for the input so far and the date of standard withdrawal, but
still need to understand if I can maintain presumption of
-
From: McInturff, Gary [mailto:gary.mcintu...@esterline.com]
Sent: 19 July 2013 16:06
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 60950 1st edition and amendments
Ha now I'm getting new words - lost favor and expired, but not so not sure I
have asked the right question and I have a follow-up
, there was about a 3 1/2 year transition window.
Peter Tarver
-Original Message-
From: McInturff, Gary
[mailto:gary.mcintu...@esterline.com]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 08:06
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 60950 1st edition and amendments
Ha now I'm getting new
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] 60950 1st edition and amendments
Gary -
Per the list of harmonized standards published by the European Commission, EN
60950-1:2001 was superseded by EN60950-1:2006 on 1JAN2010. Per CENELC's web
site, EN60950-1:2006 was published in 14APR2006.
If we were
-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 11:30 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 60950 1st edition and amendments
In message
d250d01e39356a4e9cc3b4b459d6655097dcf...@ms-cda-01.advanced-input.com,
dated Thu, 18 Jul 2013, McInturff, Gary
[mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 10:13 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 60950 1st edition and amendments
There are also amendments. As of 01 Mar 2013, this means EN60950-1:2006 plus
amendments A11:2006 , A1:2010, and A12:2011.
Jim Hulbert
-Original Message
: 'John Woodgate'; 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
Subject: Re: [PSES] 60950 1st edition and amendments
Hi Gary:
Personally, I support the sales force with whatever they
need.
If I understand correctly, you have low-voltage device.
Chances are that none of the standards changes affect
your device
Anybody know the Docopocoss (or whatever on that) on IEC 60950-1:2001, First
Edition
I have a small sale - not large enough to generate the approval fees to 2nd
edition and latest amendments. But if the date of cessation et al - hasn't
passed we could continue with the sale.
My first answer was
*From:* McInturff, Gary [mailto:gary.mcintu...@esterline.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, July 18, 2013 16:23
Anybody know the Docopocoss (or whatever on that) on IEC 60950-1:2001,
First Edition
Gary –
*EN** *60950-1:2001 lost favor on 1DEC2010.
You owe John Woodgate a nickel.
Peter Tarver
Assume that this is for the EU/EFTA.
CB report to 1st ed can be used a basis for presumption of conformity and
application of CE mark if you do a Tech File that would indicate additional
test data and/or rationale and/or construction data that indicates why all
of the new stuff up to the 2d ed
12 matches
Mail list logo
