Comments from some manufacturers: too much work (costs time and money)...
I also RECOMMEND to state the whole reference including the title but some
of my customers (managing directors...) ask me: is that LEGAL required?
Best regards
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Loerzer
Managing Director
Regulatory
In message 002201cdc508$a3e81a80$ebb84f80$@globalnorm.de, dated Sat,
17 Nov 2012, Michael Loerzer loerzer_mob...@globalnorm.de writes:
Comments from some manufacturers: too much work (costs time and
money)...
They are just being stupid. The cost and time are utterly trivial. How
much more
If the title and number were not linked together one-on-one,
Yes, I would suggest adding the title. But as they are linked, I do not see the
need !
or
There cannot bany standard be mistaken for another by referencing number and
year.
Or
Adding the title would not resolve the disambiguity caused
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA489140B07@ZEUS.cetest.local,
dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl writes:
If the title and number were not linked together one-on-one, Yes, I
would suggest adding the title. But as they are linked, I
4 matches
Mail list logo