Thanks to everyone who chimed in. Much appreciated!
From: dward [mailto:dw...@pctestlab.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 12:01 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC co-location distance question
Here is the problem with the ‘2 dB rule’. If there are only two ports
question
Right - ANSI C63.4 still makes reference to the "2dB rule"
Bill
From: Adam Dixon [mailto:lanterna.viri...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 1:03 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC co-location d
the case. The FCC considers that two
transmitters/antennas are collocated if they are in the same product /
enclosure. I hope this helps.
Bill
From: Regan Arndt [mailto:re...@empowermicro.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 1:50 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.O
that the e-mail
or attachments(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. Thank you.
From: Adam Dixon [mailto:lanterna.viri...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 11:03 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC co-location distance question
It's been awhile
Right - ANSI C63.4 still makes reference to the "2dB rule"
Bill
From: Adam Dixon [mailto:lanterna.viri...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 1:03 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC co-location distance question
It's been awhile, but at the time wh
ce when everything works but nobody knows why." *-- Albert
> Einstein
>
>
>
> *From:* Regan Arndt [mailto:re...@empowermicro.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 09, 2017 11:50 AM
> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] EMC co-location distance question
&
V.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC co-location distance question
Hi Bill. Thanks for this great info! Much appreciated.
The second part of my original email was merely philosophical discussion
points. Let me clarify. I would love to hear what people think:
1. How many different types of
the same product /
enclosure. I hope this helps.
Bill
From: Regan Arndt [mailto:re...@empowermicro.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 1:50 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: [PSES] EMC co-location distance question
Greetings members,
Can anyone
day, March 08, 2017 1:50 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EMC co-location distance question
Greetings members,
Can anyone shed any light on what ANSI defines as the max distance/limit of a
'co-located' piece of ancillary equipment or other support equipment (on the
table) to the m
Greetings members,
Can anyone shed any light on what ANSI defines as the max distance/limit of a
'co-located' piece of ancillary equipment or other support equipment (on the
table) to the main EUT being tested for FCC Part 15 class B for 'unintentional
radiators'. I seem to recall 20 cm but I
10 matches
Mail list logo