The EMC and LVD proposals refer to
document 768/2008/EC which describes conformity assessment procedures...
The famous A to H1 modules
new EMCD proposal 2011/0351 (read article 14 and annex II and III)
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0765:FIN:EN:PDF
new
In message 1afe4bc52a594a7f8820bd07b39e7...@tamuracorp.com, dated Mon,
20 Feb 2012, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com writes:
I may have missed something really big - probably English illiteracy.
The two framework regs say stuff like manufacturers shall...
You would need to cite
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA4891404C6@ZEUS.cetest.local,
dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl writes:
new EMCD proposal 2011/0351 (read article 14 and annex II and III)
Thanks John for finding this little mistake:
Corrected URL:
new LVD proposal 2011/357 (read Annex III : module A is the only option left
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0773:FIN:EN:PDF
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen, BSc
g.grem...@cetest.nl
www.cetest.nl
Thanks much. These links were avail via my OP.
What I think the EMC proposal says - submit your docs to NB, and they
evaluate company's reports.
What the NBs have said to me - submit your product to me for test and
approval and have the factory subject to CIG audit, because under NLF, we
are
I concur that, for now, the principle that self declaration remains the
basis of the system remains in place. How should the requirements for
competence and accreditation be addressed?
Conformity assessment requires:
1. Internal product control
2. Recurring product testing
The presumption of
Brian,
The answer to your second question is 'no'.
With respect, you seem to have missed the point that the NLF has no direct
bearing on manufacturers - it is a set of rules and principles for legislators,
enforcement agencies and accreditation bodies.
You can be forgiven for failing to
I may have missed something really big - probably English illiteracy.
The two framework regs say stuff like manufacturers shall... So what other
legislation allows me to ignore these regs? Are EU regs available in
Klingon?
I know this defies the law of gravity, but I never studied law.
-- Bugs
Samuel,
Definitely these are requirements for the RoHS/NLF stuff. Should probably be
explicitly stated.
But the 'periodic testing' is ill-defined, and explanations from NBs are
much hand-waving.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of
Right,
Self declaration remains the basis of the system,
the responsibilities and accreditation requirements are for notified bodies
called conformity assessment body
Both EMC and LVD proposals state under point 6(16) and 17
(6/16) The manufacturer, having detailed knowledge of the design
reference this:
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/single-market-goods/regulatory-poli
cies-common-rules-for-products/new-legislative-framework/
Doing some reading in prep for RoHS recast reporting. After reading the NLF
regs (765/2008, 768/2008) and the proposals for LVD and EMCD recast,
Brian:
The following is omitted from the summary:
- Gather and evaluate recast RoHS compliance data
- Assure Internal Production Control for recast RoHS
- Perform periodic testing for compliance with recast RoHS
- Assure non-compliant product are not placed on EU market starting 2013
Samuel
Hi Brian,
I don't recall #10 Self declaration may no longer be possible for anything
scoped by RoHS, LVD, and/or EMCD., being implied or suggested in anything
crossing my disk so far. What sources might you have that may lead me to the
same concern?
Thanks
Rick
-Original Message-
Rick,
It would seem that the intent of this NLF stuff is to force CAB-issued test
certs for all affected equipment. Read 2011/0351(COD) + 2011/0357(COD) and
tell me what you think. Also, the framework regs indicate a level of
competence, control, and accreditation that may not be possible through
14 matches
Mail list logo
