ng this e-mail
-Original Message-
From: James Pawson (U3C) [mailto:ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 5:07 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: [PSES] FW: HBES/BACS Standards in the OJ
Hi Bernd, John,
Thanks for the useful information, much app
Hi Bernd, John,
Thanks for the useful information, much appreciated.
All the best
James
-Original Message-
From: Dürrer Bernd <bernd.duer...@wilo.com>
Sent: 15 March 2018 10:00
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] AW: [PSES] FW: HBES/BACS Standards in the OJ
Hello
other parts of EN 50491 will be replaced by their IEC
63044 counterparts.
Kind regards,
Bernd
Von: James Pawson (U3C) [mailto:ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. März 2018 09:11
An: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Betreff: Re: [PSES] FW: HBES/BACS Standards in the OJ
Hi John,
Do
C-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] FW: HBES/BACS Standards in the OJ
These delays in updating the OJ list are very troublesome. Lawyers are
involved, which says it all. The 63044 series (and other new, not yet
listed standards) cannot be formally used to demonstrate conformity. A
possible so
Hi John,
Do you have an idea why a new series of standards are being introduced
rather than updating the older ones?
Thanks
James
From: John Woodgate <j...@woodjohn.uk>
Sent: 14 March 2018 23:19
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: HBES/BACS Standards in
These delays in updating the OJ list are very troublesome. Lawyers are
involved, which says it all. The 63044 series (and other new, not yet
listed standards) cannot be formally used to demonstrate conformity. A
possible solution is to ensure that the product passes the OJ listed
standard,
Hello Experts,
I didn't see my first request show up in my inbox. So I'm trying again...
A customer in Turkey has stated that the EN 50491-1 family of HBES/BACS
standards has been replaced by the EN 63044-1 family.
They want a DoC drafted with the new standards called out.
When I check the OJ
7 matches
Mail list logo