to legally bind the company, would just sign with title
affixed, or apply a thumbprint using the blood fallen engineers.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 9:56 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] New
k.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 6:10 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] New EMCD DoC Requirements
On 8/20/2015 5:20 PM, Gary McInturff wrote:
> Signed for and on behalf of - the CEO doesn't get to claim plausible
> deniability you are signing this for him.
How
On 8/20/2015 5:20 PM, Gary McInturff wrote:
Signed for and on behalf of – the CEO doesn’t get to claim plausible
deniability you are signing this for him.
How IS a CEO expected to know that what has been signed for is actually
what was done EXCEPT by relying on other peoples' signatures? Mig
continue to beat your wife. If you answer yes, the
impressions is that you are a recovering wife beater.
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 12:44 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] New EMCD DoC Requirements
To All,
It is strang
To All,
It is strange how the simplest things seem to take up the bulk of my time. Once
again we are looking at the information required on the Declaration of
Conformity. We are trying to determine if the New EMC Directive will force our
current DoC format to change from what we currently have.
5 matches
Mail list logo
