[mailto:michael_sundst...@overheaddoor.com]
*Sent:* Friday, October 25, 2013 10:34 AM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] USA Canada rf emission test standards
** **
Ian,
The Conducted RF Limits Frequency Band are lower than your stated starting
point.
Conducted
In message
camsb7http77mv-_4oxmgetoqutoo+pnowyekmxxuzt4zmcs...@mail.gmail.com,
dated Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Pat Lawler plawl...@gmail.com writes:
In reviewing ICES-003, Issue 5-2012, I noticed the Class B radiated
limits are sometimes higher than Class A limits by as much as 4.5dB!
Oops -- that's what I get when trying to read EMC standards at 6:30am.
More coffee, please.
Pat
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote:
In message CAMsB7HTTP77Mv-_**4oXmGetoqUToo+**pNoWYEkMxxuzT4ZmCs4kw@mail.*
: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:35 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] USA Canada rf emission test standards
Dear Colleagues;
I am trying to combine FCC 47 CFR part 15 and Canadian ICES-003:2012 radiated
rf emission testing for a digital device that is an unintentional radiator
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 9:38 AM
To: 'Ian McBurney'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] USA Canada rf emission test standards
Hello Ian - In combining the test standards do you mean methodology or limits
or both?
ICES 003 has different limits to the FCC published limits - so
: [PSES] USA Canada rf emission test standards
Hello Ian - In combining the test standards do you mean methodology or limits
or both?
ICES 003 has different limits to the FCC published limits - so be aware of
that. For the test methods
refer to the other emails in the thread.
From: Ian McBurney
Reviewing Engineer
PCTEST
From: Sundstrom, Michael [mailto:michael_sundst...@overheaddoor.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 10:34 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] USA Canada rf emission test standards
Ian,
The Conducted RF Limits Frequency Band are lower than your stated
Dear Colleagues;
I am trying to combine FCC 47 CFR part 15 and Canadian ICES-003:2012
radiated rf emission testing for a digital device that is an unintentional
radiator.
However; looking into the test standards for each country I am getting
perplexed.
It appears that for 47 CFR part 15 sub
: 17 September 2013 16:35
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] USA Canada rf emission test standards
Dear Colleagues;
I am trying to combine FCC 47 CFR part 15 and Canadian ICES-003:2012
radiated rf emission testing for a digital device that is an unintentional
radiator.
However
-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGmailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] USA Canada rf emission test standards
Dear Colleagues;
I am trying to combine FCC 47 CFR part 15 and Canadian ICES-003:2012 radiated
rf emission testing for a digital device that is an unintentional radiator.
However; looking
virus or other
defect. Thank you.
From: Ian McBurney [mailto:ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 8:35 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] USA Canada rf emission test standards
Dear Colleagues;
I am trying to combine FCC 47 CFR part 15
you.
From: Ian McBurney [mailto:ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 8:35 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] USA Canada rf emission test standards
Dear Colleagues;
I am trying to combine FCC 47 CFR part 15 and Canadian ICES-003:2012
radiated
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] USA Canada rf emission test standards
Dear Colleagues;
I am trying to combine FCC 47 CFR part 15 and Canadian ICES-003:2012 radiated
rf emission testing for a digital device that is an unintentional radiator.
However; looking into the test standards for each
13 matches
Mail list logo
