patico.ca> ; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:54 PM
Subject: RE: Fw, Yahoo Groups Recommendation?: Changes to IEEE emc-pstc
web-based services...
Pardon me if this has been decided already but I think you need to be
made aware of this.
Our corporate net nanny has block
ifice our function to meet the IEEE needs. Whatever scheme the
IEEE arrives at, it will not drive
us to satisfy the scheme versus satisfying our subscribers.
Best wishes for the New Year!
Rich
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[ mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Gordon,Ian
Sen
I will miss the list-server. :-(
S.E.E.C. is a USENET newsgroup, IMHO it suffer from being a bit out of the
way. Often people who post questions or who have an itch to post, ought to
(but do not) comb/search through the topics (threads) on a daily basis
before they do that. I am afraid that I
I read in !emc-pstc that Bill Lyons wrote (in
<97...@lyons.demon.co.uk>) about 'Changes to IEEE emc-pstc web-based
services' on Thu, 2 Jan 2003:
>As an alternative, if sadly EMC-PSTC does go this retrograde way, we
>could all simply move to the sci.engr.electric
In message Nick Williams writes:
>
> I missed the original post which generated this thread in the last
> few days. Please could someone send it to me directly?
Happy New Year, Nick. It was attached to e.g. Luke Turnbull's post.
Copy below.
> I too would be very concerned to see the forum ch
.
Thanks
Ian Gordon
From: Luke Turnbull [mailto:luke.turnb...@trw.com]
Sent: 02 January 2003 09:22
To: <
Subject: Re: Changes to IEEE emc-pstc web-based services
This won't work. If you want to look at how badly online forums work, look
at the IEE website.
Maybe one of the group can
I missed the original post which generated this thread in the last
few days. Please could someone send it to me directly?
I too would be very concerned to see the forum changed from its
current e-mail delivery format, to the extent that if necessary (and
subject to it being possible - it's not
This won't work. If you want to look at how badly online forums work, look at
the IEE website.
Maybe one of the group can set up a list server elsewhere if the IEEE is sure
it wants to stop the service.
Luke Turnbull.
>>> Rich Nute 12/31/02 06:19pm >>>
Effective today, we are replacing our w
I shall be sorry to lose access to the daily interchange among the EMC
professionals who've made this list worth subscribing to. Provision of a
link in e-mails is not even a poor substitute for those of us who wish to
use off-line readers. This is reminiscent, in its own inexorable way, to
the cr
ojan
SCS
www.regulatory-compliance.com
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Pommerenke, David
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 8:55 AM
To: John Woodgate; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Changes to IEEE emc-pstc web-based services
Without the list server, you will lose a massive following. This includes
myself.
Tony Nikolassy
T-Tech Engineering Labs
John has succinctly summed up the
situation that many of us find ourselves in.
It is a shame that the internet community is
being divided into the "haves and
havenots" (broadband vs. dial up).
I for one refuse to be forced to "upgrade"
to broadband from my very satisfactory
$7.50/month curr
Dear Group,
My experience is that with WEB-based systems there will be significantly
less participation. Posting of large documents, as people will not
carefully think about file size, compression down-sampling etc will make
it worse for people on dial-up connections. Discussions will be based on
In message <44+byya84qe+e...@jmwa.demon.co.uk> John Woodgate writes:
> It seems to me that the web site system is OK for people with 'always-
> on' connection, but for those of us on dial-up, especially pay-as-you-go
> dial up, it will be too expensive to justify participation.
I strongly suppor
I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute wrote (in ) about 'Changes to IEEE emc-pstc web-
based services' on Tue, 31 Dec 2002:
>To the extent that we can, we'd
>like to move our activity to the web rather than use the
>listserver.
It seems to me that the web site
15 matches
Mail list logo
