Your comments remind me of how FCC limits began a few decades ago.
As many may recall, in the days before "real" PCs, Playstations and the like,
Coleman and others began marketing ping pong games one could play on
their TV set.
Since TVs had no direct inputs at the time, the small game box fed
We agree. The "gray area" arises from the fact that
"residential" is not strictly defined. When the
distinction was first made in subpart B, it hinged on
whether equipment was sold for use in the home, not
whether it was installed close to a home or farther
away.
I take the position that the nee
I may have gotten in on the tail end of the dicussion, but here is my take on
residential DSL.
The FCC rules are quite clear on equipment marketed to residential environments,
Class B. The DSL equipment being sold to residences must comply with class B
limits
notwithstanding office use.
small,
The reason for the Part 15 residential (Class B) limit is to protect
reception, and the levels prescribed are (arguably) low enough to do so. If
we allow higher levels, we are asking for service calls and perhaps
official attention. But (unless I am mistaken) it is now the USER who
responsible for
Just making a quick check here. I'm seeing some product brochures out
indicating some of these home units are class A. Am I missing something here,
shouldn't that be class B. The fact its phone stuff (also carries the FCC part
68 stuff) can't override this classification correct?
5 matches
Mail list logo
