RE: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-17 Thread Wiz
] On Behalf Of Grasso, Charles Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 9:40 AM To: 'John Woodgate'; 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org' Subject: RE: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures John et al. Thanks for your observations. If I understand the new methodology then I (a mnaufacturer) can

Re: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-14 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Grasso, Charles charles.gra...@echostar.com wrote (in DEDA59C30D344E4182D1A4DAB86C5B78082868C2@riv- exch2.echostar.com) about 'Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures' on Fri, 14 Nov 2003: If I understand the new methodology then I (a mnaufacturer

RE: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-14 Thread Grasso, Charles
anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures Is FCC+FCC= FCC , that is line the old CE+CE = CE line? AFAIK, if the set up passed, it 'may' not be tested again. And 'may' is rather meaningless. Shall is the right words. In the past, there is always a phrase This device complies

RE: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-14 Thread Grasso, Charles
...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 2:19 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures I read in !emc-pstc that Cortland Richmond 72146@compuserve.com wrote (in 200311131630_mc3-1-5a13-7...@compuserve.com) about 'Does

Re: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-14 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Cortland Richmond 72146@compuserve.com wrote (in 200311131630_mc3-1-5a13-7...@compuserve.com) about 'Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures' on Thu, 13 Nov 2003: Can a monitor purchased from an OEM have a company label slapped on it and sold

Re: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-13 Thread Wan Juang Foo
Is FCC+FCC= FCC , that is line the old CE+CE = CE line? AFAIK, if the set up passed, it 'may' not be tested again. And 'may' is rather meaningless. Shall is the right words. In the past, there is always a phrase This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subjected to

Re: Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-13 Thread Cortland Richmond
Charles Grasso wrote Can a monitor purchased from an OEM have a company label slapped on it and sold WITHOUT the company testing it in a system? Looks like it! One of my EMI horror stories concerns a monitor I found could make a computer NEXT to it, not even turned on, exceed the Part 15

Does anyone system test PCs anymore? - Q on new procedures

2003-11-12 Thread Grasso, Charles
Greetings all, I left the PC buisness prior to the new (and improved?) ClassB test procedures. In the old days large companies that marketed PCs were very diligent in testing combinations of monitors, printers computers. Does that still happen now? Can a monitor be purchased from an OEM have a