Interesting that this would come up.
I just read an article in Medical Device Diagnostic Industry
magazine that discusses the fields generated by anti-theft systems.
You can see it at
http://www.devicelink.com/mddi/archive/00/01/016.html
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000 08:45:12 + (GMT),
Inc.
Plymouth MN
From: Price, Ed ed.pr...@cubic.com
To: 'tim.hay...@gecm.com' tim.hay...@gecm.com,
emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:RE: EN standard for pacemaker immunity
Date sent: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:29:36 -0800
Send reply
: Re: EN standard for pacemaker immunity
Hi everyone,
Except for official certification - it is not the standard that is
the most important.
Consider the field strengths that the person (hence pacemaker) will be
exposed to. Are the standards realistic or were they created to give
Tim,
If your friend is having the problems you state then one can say that the
equpment is not suitable for the environment in which it is to be used.
The thing to remember about the EC legislation that the use of standards is not
the answer to everything, and meeting the standards does not
Hi everyone,
Except for official certification - it is not the standard that is
the most important.
Consider the field strengths that the person (hence pacemaker) will be
exposed to. Are the standards realistic or were they created to give a
MINIMUM level of confidence to some authority?
What
MHz. The electric field need not be
investigated.
Richard Woods
--
From: Ned Devine [SMTP:ndev...@entela.com]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 2:29 PM
To: 'plaw...@west.net'; EMC-PSTC
Subject: RE: EN standard for pacemaker immunity
Hi
: Re: EN standard for pacemaker immunity
As an excerise, I tried to find the directive that this standard was
harmonized under.
I looked on the Europa site under the EMC, Medical Device, and Active
Implantable Medical Device directives to no avail.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach
Subject: Re: EN standard for pacemaker immunity
As an excerise, I tried to find the directive that this standard was
harmonized under.
I looked on the Europa site under the EMC, Medical Device, and
Active
Implantable Medical Device directives to no avail
--
From: Michael Taylor [SMTP:mtay...@hach.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 9:19 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: EN standard for pacemaker immunity
Greetings all.
An issue came up that needs answers as soon as possible. Does
anyone
.
Medtronic, Guidant, St Jude Med)
Good Luck
-Original Message-
From: jestuckey [mailto:jestuc...@micron.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 12:15 PM
To: 'Michael Taylor'
Cc: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: RE: EN standard for pacemaker immunity
Contact ISMAEL MARTINEZ NCE/NCT 210-522
Emerald St.
Boise, Idaho 83704
PH: (208) 363-5313
FX: (208) 363-5596
jestuc...@micron.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael Taylor [mailto:mtay...@hach.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 07:19
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: EN standard for pacemaker immunity
Greetings all
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: EN standard for pacemaker immunity
Greetings all.
An issue came up that needs answers as soon as possible. Does
anyone in the
group know if there are any European standards covering pacemaker
(and
similar devices
Greetings all.
An issue came up that needs answers as soon as possible. Does anyone in the
group know if there are any European standards covering pacemaker (and
similar devices) immunity to Electric Magnetic fields. A search of Global
Eng. Documents product list proved fruitless. I'm sure
13 matches
Mail list logo
