RE: Environmental question

2002-07-01 Thread Peters, Michael
- From: Muriel Bittencourt de Liz [mailto:mur...@eel.ufsc.br] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:13 PM To: Lista de EMC da IEEE Subject: Environmental question Hello Group, We already know the standards related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields (e.g. ANSI/IEEE). However some people have asked

RE: Environmental question

2002-06-26 Thread Andrew Carson
Douglas [mailto:dougl...@naradnetworks.com] Sent: 26 June 2002 13:22 To: Lista de EMC da IEEE Subject: RE: Environmental question Not to keep this old thing going forever, but the most likely scenario for the trees growing larger/stronger might be a combination of effects. When you open up

RE: Environmental question

2002-06-26 Thread Scott Douglas
Schanker [mailto:schan...@frontiernet.net] Sent: 25 June 2002 20:18 To: Andrew Carson; Scott Douglas; Muriel Bittencourt de Liz; Lista de EMC da IEEE Subject: Re: Environmental question Andrew: One could theorize that the better growth had nothing to do with RF, but with the tower not competing

RE: Environmental question

2002-06-26 Thread Andrew Carson
[mailto:schan...@frontiernet.net] Sent: 25 June 2002 20:18 To: Andrew Carson; Scott Douglas; Muriel Bittencourt de Liz; Lista de EMC da IEEE Subject: Re: Environmental question Andrew: One could theorize that the better growth had nothing to do with RF, but with the tower not competing

Re: Environmental question

2002-06-25 Thread Jacob Schanker
, June 25, 2002 11:13 AM Subject: RE: Environmental question I remember reading an article about this in New Scientist. After several years of operation they had found the Trees to either side of the antenna were growing taller and stronger than the rest of those in the Forest. Andrew Carson Senior

Re: Environmental question

2002-06-25 Thread Ken Javor
of rant. -- From: mark_mayn...@dell.com To: mur...@eel.ufsc.br, emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Environmental question Date: Tue, Jun 25, 2002, 10:26 AM The Nordic countries (Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark) have done the most research into this issue, that I am aware of. If you look

RE: Environmental question

2002-06-25 Thread Mark_Maynard
- Mark M. -Original Message- From: Muriel Bittencourt de Liz [mailto:mur...@eel.ufsc.br] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:13 PM To: Lista de EMC da IEEE Subject: Environmental question Hello Group, We already know the standards related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields (e.g. ANSI

RE: Environmental question

2002-06-25 Thread Andrew Carson
Message- From: Scott Douglas [mailto:dougl...@naradnetworks.com] Sent: 25 June 2002 13:16 To: Muriel Bittencourt de Liz; Lista de EMC da IEEE Subject: Re: Environmental question Muriel, Don't know if there are any agency type regulations but can remember this issue came up when the government

Re: Environmental question

2002-06-25 Thread Scott Douglas
Muriel, Don't know if there are any agency type regulations but can remember this issue came up when the government wanted to install a communications antenna in the north woods of Wisconsin. The antenna was to be used to communicate to submarines deep under water using something like 30 Hz

Re: Environmental question

2002-06-25 Thread Jacob Schanker
: Environmental question | | Hello Group, | | We already know the standards related to human exposure to electromagnetic | fields (e.g. ANSI/IEEE). However some people have asked us if there is any | standard/recommendations limiting the exposure of forests, lakes/rivers, | animals, etc to RF

Environmental question

2002-06-24 Thread Muriel Bittencourt de Liz
Hello Group, We already know the standards related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields (e.g. ANSI/IEEE). However some people have asked us if there is any standard/recommendations limiting the exposure of forests, lakes/rivers, animals, etc to RF fields. Do you know any FDA and EPA (or